跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

debugging-websocket-issues

Use when seeing WebSocket errors like "Invalid frame header", "RSV1 must be clear", or "WS_ERR_UNEXPECTED_RSV_1" - covers multiple WebSocketServer conflicts, compression issues, and raw frame debugging techniques

代码质量与审查867.claude/skills/debugging-websocket-issues/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/agentworkforce/relay/debugging-websocket-issues/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Debugging WebSocket Issues

Overview

WebSocket "invalid frame header" errors often stem from raw HTTP being written to an upgraded socket, not actual frame corruption. The most common cause is multiple WebSocketServer instances conflicting on the same HTTP server.

When to Use

  • Error: Invalid WebSocket frame: RSV1 must be clear
  • Error: WS_ERR_UNEXPECTED_RSV_1
  • Error: Invalid frame header
  • WebSocket connects then immediately disconnects with code 1006
  • Server logs success but client receives garbage data

Quick Reference

SymptomLikely CauseFix
RSV1 must be clearMultiple WSS on same server OR compression mismatchUse noServer: true mode
Hex starts with 48545450Raw HTTP on WebSocket (0x48='H')Check for conflicting upgrade handlers
Code 1006, no reasonAbnormal closure, often server-side abortCheck abortHandshake calls
Works isolated, fails in appSomething else writing to socketAudit all upgrade listeners

The Multiple WebSocketServer Bug

Problem

When attaching multiple WebSocketServer instances to the same HTTP server using the server option:

// ❌ BAD - Both servers add upgrade listeners, causing conflicts
const wss1 = new WebSocketServer({ server, path: '/ws' });
const wss2 = new WebSocketServer({ server, path: '/ws/other' });

What happens:

  1. Client connects to /ws
  2. BOTH upgrade handlers fire (Node.js EventEmitter calls all listeners)
  3. wss1 matches path, handles upgrade successfully
  4. wss2 doesn't match, calls abortHandshake(socket, 400)
  5. Raw HTTP/1.1 400 Bad Request written to the now-WebSocket socket
  6. Client receives HTTP text as WebSocket frame data
  7. First byte 0x48 ('H') interpreted as: RSV1=1, opcode=8 → invalid frame

Solution

Use noServer: true and manually route upgrades:

// ✅ GOOD - Single upgrade handler routes to correct server
const wss1 = new WebSocketServer({ noServer: true, perMessageDeflate: false });
const wss2 = new WebSocketServer({ noServer: true, perMessageDeflate: false });

server.on('upgrade', (request, socket, head) => {
  const pathname = new URL(request.url || '', `http://${request.headers.host}`).pathname;

  if (pathname === '/ws') {
    wss1.handleUpgrade(request, socket, head, (ws) => {
      wss1.emit('connection', ws, request);
    });
  } else if (pathname === '/ws/other') {
    wss2.handleUpgrade(request, socket, head, (ws) => {
      wss2.emit('connection', ws, request);
    });
  } else {
    socket.destroy();
  }
});

Debugging Techniques

Raw Frame Inspection

Hook into the socket to see actual bytes received:

ws.on('open', () => {
  const socket = ws._socket;
  const originalPush = socket.push.bind(socket);

  socket.push = function (chunk, encoding) {
    if (chunk) {
      console.log('First 20 bytes (hex):', chunk.slice(0, 20).toString('hex'));
      const byte0 = chunk[0];
      console.log(`FIN: ${!!(byte0 & 0x80)}, RSV1: ${!!(byte0 & 0x40)}, Opcode: ${byte0 & 0x0f}`);

      // Check if it's actually HTTP text
      if (chunk.slice(0, 4).toString() === 'HTTP') {
        console.log('*** RECEIVED RAW HTTP ON WEBSOCKET ***');
      }
    }
    return originalPush(chunk, encoding);
  };
});

Key Hex Patterns

  • 81 = FIN + text frame (normal)
  • 82 = FIN + binary frame (normal)
  • 88 = FIN + close frame (normal)
  • 48545450 = "HTTP" - raw HTTP on WebSocket (bug!)
  • c1 or similar with bit 6 set = compressed frame (RSV1=1)

Common Mistakes

MistakeResultFix
Multiple WSS with server optionHTTP 400 written to socketUse noServer: true
perMessageDeflate: true (default in older ws)RSV1 set on framesExplicitly set perMessageDeflate: false
Not checking upgrade headersMiss compression negotiationLog sec-websocket-extensions header
Assuming RSV1 error = compressionCould be raw HTTPCheck if bytes decode as ASCII "HTTP"

Verification Checklist

After fixing, verify:

  • RSV1: false in frame inspection
  • Extensions header: NONE in upgrade response
  • No HTTP/1.1 in raw frame data
  • Messages received match sent payload size
  • Multiple broadcasts work (test interval sends)

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查