跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

indication-dossier

Generate a therapeutic indication dossier. Covers the patient population, epidemiology, disease biology, standard of care, regulatory precedent, and landmark clinical trials.

科研5.5kresources/skills/indication-dossier/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/aipoch/open-science/indication-dossier/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Indication Dossier

Produces a structured research dossier on a single indication, framed as a patient population: who they are, what's wrong, how they're treated today, and how clinical trials can be designed to help them. Runs as five phases that write resumable waypoint files; after a brief identity check at the end of Phase 1, the remaining phases run straight through.

Framing

Think of an indication as a patient population. Frame everything from the patient perspective: "Who are these patients?" not "What is this disease?"; "How are these patients identified and managed?" not "What causes this condition?"; population nesting: "all patients in {child} are patients in {parent}".

Some indications don't map to ICD codes or standard disease definitions: "immunosenescence" is a biological state, not a billable diagnosis; "ageing" is not an FDA-accepted indication; "GLP-1 induced sarcopenia" is an iatrogenic population. Note these distinctions explicitly. They matter for regulatory path and trial design.

Inputs

  • indication (required) — indication name (e.g., "sarcopenia", "idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis").
  • additional_context (optional) — areas to focus on, parent indication, or other framing.
  • workdir (optional) — where to write waypoints and the final report. Defaults to ./do_not_commit/indication-dossier-<slug>/.

Tools this skill expects

PurposeTool
ClinicalTrials.govclinical-trials MCP
Literaturepubmed MCP
WebWebSearch, WebFetch — FDA guidance, treatment guidelines (NCCN, AASLD, specialty societies), CDC/WHO epidemiology data
DocumentsWebFetch for remote PDFs; Read for local PDFs
SubagentsAgent for parallel evidence gathering

If a listed MCP isn't connected, say so and fall back to WebSearch against the underlying public source (clinicaltrials.gov, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

Output layout

<workdir>/
└── waypoints/
    ├── progress.json                 # loop control
    ├── meta.json                     # phase 1
    ├── epidemiology.json             # phase 2
    ├── biology_soc.json              # phase 3
    ├── regulatory_trials.json        # phase 4
    ├── sources_evaluated.json
    ├── research_output.json          # phase 5 — structured output
    └── indication_dossier_report.md  # phase 5 — the deliverable

Schemas for every waypoint file are in references/waypoint-schemas.md. Waypoints are the resumable state. If the workdir already has waypoints, read them, summarize what's done, and ask which phase to resume from.

Before starting

Read references/00-research-standards.md. It governs sourcing and the anti-fabrication rules for every phase. Then create <workdir>/waypoints/.

Workflow

The dossier is built in five phases. After each phase, write the waypoint file and emit a ≤200-word summary of what you found and what's uncertain, then proceed directly to the next phase. The one exception is Phase 1: after writing meta.json, show the resolved indication identity and call ask_user with options Proceed / Revise identity / Stop, so a misread indication name can be caught before the expensive phases run. If ask_user is unavailable, state "proceeding on this interpretation; interrupt now to correct it" and continue.

Phase 1 — Meta initialization

Read references/01-meta-initialization.md. Resolve the indication identity: clinical definition, ICD codes, aliases, parent indication, and whether it's a recognized diagnostic entity. Run a quick CT.gov landscape scan. Stand up waypoints/meta.json.

Phase 2 — Epidemiology research

Read references/02-epidemiology-research.md. Characterize the population: diagnostic criteria, prevalence and incidence, demographics and risk factors, natural history. Use parallel subagents to search PubMed and the web simultaneously. Write waypoints/epidemiology.json.

Phase 3 — Biology & standard-of-care research

Read references/03-biology-soc-research.md. Establish pathophysiology, biomarkers, approved therapies, treatment guidelines, and unmet need. Use parallel subagents: PubMed for biology, web for guidelines, FDA for approvals. Write waypoints/biology_soc.json.

Phase 4 — Regulatory & trials research

Read references/04-regulatory-trials-research.md. Establish FDA/EMA accepted endpoints, regulatory precedents, typical trial design parameters, landmark trials, and notable failures. Use parallel subagents: FDA for guidance/approvals, CT.gov for trial patterns, PubMed for trial-history reviews. Write waypoints/regulatory_trials.json.

Phase 5 — Synthesis

Read references/05-synthesis.md and references/06-writing-style.md. Read all four consolidated waypoint files. Write waypoints/indication_dossier_report.md — narrative sections in the order the synthesis reference specifies, with inline citations per the style guide — and waypoints/research_output.json. No new research threads in this phase. Targeted gap-fills are allowed: a single fetch to resolve a specific missing value in an existing waypoint field (an approval year, an NCT ID, a figure from a sponsor pipeline page). Anything broader than that, name as a gap rather than filling it.

Resuming

If invoked with a workdir that already contains waypoints: list which phases are complete (waypoint file exists and is non-empty), show the meta summary, and ask the user which phase to run next. Never overwrite an existing waypoint without confirmation.

相似的 Skill

lead-research-assistant
ComposioHQ/awesome-claude-skills77k

lead-research-assistant

Identifies high-quality leads for your product or service by analyzing your business, searching for target companies, and providing actionable contact strategies. Perfect for sales, business development, and marketing professionals.

科研

cellprofiler
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k

cellprofiler

Runs reproducible CellProfiler microscopy pipelines for nuclear segmentation, cell counts, and per-object fluorescence measurements. Supports image/channel manifests, headless batch execution, segmentation overlays, and measurement QC for 2D fluorescence assays.

科研

autoskill
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k

autoskill

Analyzes user-requested Screenpipe history windows to detect repeated research workflows, match existing scientific skills, and stage new skill drafts or composition recipes for review. Requires a reachable Screenpipe HTTP API, normally on localhost:3030. Detection and embedding inference run locally; the selected LLM receives redacted app/title cluster summaries and matched skill descriptions. Use only when the user explicitly asks to analyze their recent work and propose skills.

科研

arbor
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k

arbor

Applies Arbor Hypothesis Tree Refinement to research artifacts with repeatable evaluators, including model training, agent harnesses, data synthesis and benchmark optimization. Uses persistent hypotheses, isolated experiments, evidence propagation and held-out candidate comparison for multi-experiment research runs. Includes a standard-library state manager and guidance for the RUC-NLPIR Arbor CLI.

科研

cantera
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k

cantera

Runs Cantera homogeneous chemical reactors and evaluates ignition delay with mechanism provenance, conservation checks, and numerical refinement. Use for combustion kinetics, closed adiabatic ideal-gas constant-volume or constant-pressure ignition, temperature histories, or mechanism-specific ignition-delay comparisons.

科研

bgpt-paper-search
K-Dense-AI/scientific-agent-skills48k

bgpt-paper-search

Searches BGPT scientific papers by topic or DOI and retrieves claim-level evidence extracted from full text, including experiments, reported statistics, scope, limitations, and provenance. Use for literature reviews, evidence synthesis, and finding experimental details beyond abstracts.

科研