review-proposals

---

name: systematic-debugging

description: Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes

---

name: receiving-code-review

description: Use when receiving code review feedback, before implementing suggestions, especially if feedback seems unclear or technically questionable - requires technical rigor and verification, not performative agreement or blind implementation

---

name: requesting-code-review

description: Use when completing tasks, implementing major features, or before merging to verify work meets requirements

---

name: improve-codebase-architecture

description: Scan a codebase for deepening opportunities, present them as a visual HTML report, then grill through whichever one you pick.

---

name: diagnosing-bugs

description: Diagnosis loop for hard bugs and performance regressions. Use when the user says "diagnose"/"debug this", or reports something broken/throwing/failing/slow.

---

name: code-review

description: Review the changes since a fixed point (commit, branch, tag, or merge-base) along two axes: Standards (does the code follow this repo's documented coding standards?) and Spec (does the code match what the originating issue/spec asked for?). Runs both reviews in parallel sub-agents and reports them side by side. Use when the user wants to review a branch, a PR, work-in-progress changes, or asks to "review since X".