跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

code-understand

Map the load-bearing files, symbols, callers, and dependencies of an unfamiliar codebase before making changes. Use for architecture orientation, impact analysis, what-would-break questions, or finding callers. Uses CodeGraph when available and a dependency-free builtin fallback.

代码质量与审查3.5k.skills/code-understand/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/ar9av/obsidian-wiki/code-understand/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Code Understand — On-Demand Architecture Focus Map

You are about to work in a codebase you don't fully know yet. Instead of grepping around or reading files at random, ask the local extractor for a focus map: the ranked symbols the architecture hangs on, each with a file:line citation and evidence type. Read only what it points at — this is a map, not a substitute for reading the actual code it cites.

When to reach for this

  • Before editing an unfamiliar module — see what calls it and what it calls before changing its shape.
  • The user asks "how does X work", "what's the impact of changing Y", "who else uses this function" for a codebase, not the wiki.
  • You're about to do a large refactor and want a ranked list of load-bearing files instead of reading the whole tree.
  • You already have a diff or a set of changed files and want to know their blast radius before finishing the change.

Not for: summarizing what a project does for the wiki (that's wiki-update Step 3b, which calls this same command as part of a bigger sync flow) — use this skill directly only when you need the focus map for your own immediate work, not to persist knowledge.

Running it

obsidian-wiki code-understand --project <dir> [--backend auto|builtin|codegraph] \
    [--changed <file>...] [--since <sha>] [--max-symbols N] [--pretty]
  • --project — defaults to the current directory.
  • No --changed/--since — seeds from every tracked file (full-project scan).
  • --changed <file> (repeatable) — seed from specific files you already know are relevant (e.g. files in the diff you're about to make).
  • --since <sha> — seed from everything changed since a git ref (e.g. --since HEAD~5 or a base branch).
  • --backend — auto (default) uses CodeGraph when installed, falls back to the builtin extractor otherwise; force builtin for the dependency-free path, or codegraph to require the enhanced backend (fails loudly if it's not installed rather than silently degrading).
  • --max-symbols — cap the focus map size (default 50); keep this small for a quick orientation pass, raise it for a thorough one.

GUARD: if the command is unavailable or errors, skip it and fall back to your normal exploration (grep/read) — this is an accelerant, not a dependency. Don't block work on it.

Reading the output

  1. Evidence type matters. When backend: codegraph, focus-map entries are structural facts (real call-graph edges) — cite them directly. When backend: builtin, defines/ imports/changed-file entries are facts, but rg-reference entries are text-match evidence only — open the file and confirm before treating it as a real relationship.
  2. Open what it cites, nothing else first. The focus map tells you where to read; it never contains source bodies. Go read those file:line locations before forming an opinion on the architecture.
  3. Cite it in your own output. If you explain the architecture back to the user or write it into a PR description/commit message, keep the (file:lines) citations from the focus map or from the source you opened — don't assert structure without a pointer to it.
  4. It's a cache, not a deliverable. Never write the raw JSON or .codegraph/ into the wiki vault, a PR description, or committed docs — it's a disposable sidecar in the project repo (git-ignored). Re-run it fresh next time rather than treating old output as durable.

If CodeGraph isn't installed

auto/builtin still work with zero setup (uses the regex AST extractor + rg). If you want the enhanced cross-file call-graph evidence and the user is fine with installing something:

npm install -g @colbymchenry/codegraph

or point CODE_UNDERSTANDING_CODEGRAPH_BIN at an existing binary. Never install without the user's go-ahead — ask first, then re-run the command.

Check obsidian-wiki doctor --project <dir> for the code-understanding.* capability lines (builtin, rg, codegraph, codegraph-index, codegraph-fresh, codegraph-gitignore) to see what's available before deciding which backend to request explicitly.

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查