跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

goal-framing

Use when the user explicitly sets an Aegis goal with /aegis-goal, Aegis goal:, or asks to define goal, success evidence, stop condition, or task boundaries before work.

代码质量与审查1.3kskills/goal-framing/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/ganyuanran/aegis/goal-framing/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Aegis Goal Framing

Use this skill to create a thin goal frame before execution. It is opt-in and boundary-setting only.

Do not use it for tiny edits, one-command checks, or ordinary fast-path Q&A unless the user explicitly asks for /aegis-goal or Aegis goal:.

Authority Boundary

Current owner:

  • Method Pack task framing

Not owned here:

  • authoritative GateDecision
  • final evidence sufficiency
  • final completion authority is not owned here
  • host daemon / automatic stop enforcement

Input Forms

Treat these as equivalent:

  • /aegis-goal <task description>
  • Aegis goal: <task description>
  • "Define the goal / stop condition before we start"

Slash commands are optional host shortcuts. The natural-language form is the portable fallback.

Example:

Aegis goal: Fix the auth refresh bug without rewriting the auth system.

Output

Produce the smallest useful frame, then continue into the routed workflow in the same turn.

TaskIntentDraft:
- Requested outcome:
- Goal:
- Success evidence:
- Stop condition:
- Non-goals:
- Constraints:
- Scope:
- Risk hints:
- Aegis Visibility:
- Route:
- Next:

Default behavior:

  • Do not stop after TaskIntentDraft.
  • Treat the frame as the start protocol for execution, not as the final answer.
  • After the compact frame, immediately take the Next action for the selected route when the user asked to do the work.
  • Keep the visible frame natural and short when the goal is clear; do not emit a large internal-looking card unless the user asked for a formal frame.
  • Use Aegis Visibility to say why the goal frame constrains the route, stop condition, or non-goals. Do not add trace ceremony unless the user explicitly asks for auditability.

Frame-only behavior:

  • Stop at the frame only when the user explicitly asks to only define the goal, only define the stop condition, not execute, not implement, not write a plan, or wait for confirmation before continuing.
  • If required information is missing, state the missing input and stop with blocked rather than pretending to continue.

Stop condition must distinguish:

State set: done, blocked, needs-verification, scope-exceeded.

  • done: success evidence is satisfied
  • blocked: required dependency, permission, or information is missing
  • needs-verification: implementation exists but evidence is insufficient
  • scope-exceeded: continuing would exceed the goal or non-goals

Routing

After framing:

  • Low-risk single-owner work continues through the normal fast path or TDD
  • Ambiguous product / architecture / contract work routes to brainstorming
  • Approved requirements route to writing-plans
  • Multi-step, compaction-prone, handoff, or subagent work routes to long-task-continuation
  • Bug diagnosis routes to systematic-debugging

Route Matrix

Goal signalRoute
single-owner, low-risk, clear verificationfast path or test-driven-development
bug, failure, regression, unexpected behaviorsystematic-debugging
ambiguous product, architecture, contract, cross-module behaviorbrainstorming
approved spec, stable requirements, implementation slicingwriting-plans
multi-step, compaction-prone, handoff, subagent worklong-task-continuation
completion, release, handoff, "is this done?"verification-before-completion

Only create docs/aegis/ records when the routed workflow needs persistent evidence. Goal framing alone does not create project files.

Subagent Context Packet

When delegating work, pass a compact packet instead of the full conversation:

SubagentContextPacket:
- Task:
- Goal:
- Stop condition:
- Relevant baseline refs:
- Relevant files:
- Known facts:
- Unknowns:
- Non-goals:
- Expected output:
- Verification expected:
- Must-read excerpts:
- Unsafe assumptions:

The packet reduces repeated file reading, but it does not replace evidence. Subagents should still read the smallest raw file/log/test excerpt needed to verify critical facts.

Do not paste full chat transcripts, full session history, or unbounded logs into the packet. If a fact matters, include a file ref, line/window hint, or compact must-read excerpt.

Drift Rule

If the goal changes mid-task, do not silently overwrite it. Record old goal, new goal, changed scope, new risks, and route through DriftCheckDraft when a long-task record exists.

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查