跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、智能体、博客、Skill 和 MCP

ai-team-orchestration

官方

Bootstrap and run a lightweight multi-agent development team. Use when starting or adopting a project, planning work, coordinating implementation and optional QA, brainstorming with distinct perspectives, or preserving context across sessions.

测试40kskills/ai-team-orchestration/SKILL.md

安装

将以下指令发送给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor,智能体会先检查内容的安全性,经你确认后再安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/github/awesome-copilot/ai-team-orchestration/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

AI Team Orchestration

Use three stable agents:

AgentPurpose
@ai-team-producerClarify scope, plan proportionately, coordinate, and merge
@ai-team-devImplement, test, self-review, and prepare the pull request
@ai-team-qaIndependently test behavior when dedicated QA is useful

Nova, Sage, and Milo are perspectives inside the Dev agent, not mandatory project layers.

Default Workflow

Plan -> Implement -> Test -> optional review or QA -> Merge -> update project state

Keep the workflow proportional:

  • Skip formal planning for small, obvious changes.
  • Use a short plan for multi-step or cross-cutting work.
  • Add independent review or QA when risk, uncertainty, or repository policy justifies it.
  • Let branch protection, required checks, permissions, and merge queues enforce repository merge policy.

Start or Adopt a Project

  1. Read existing repository instructions and documentation.
  2. Discover the actual stack, architecture, commands, deployment model, and risks.
  3. Create or update PROJECT_BRIEF.md only when durable cross-session context is useful. Start from the project brief template and omit irrelevant sections.
  4. For substantial work, create a concise plan from the sprint plan template.
  5. Use a separate branch or clone when parallel sessions could conflict, following the repository's own Git policy.

Execute

Producer

  • Define the outcome, constraints, acceptance criteria, and explicit exclusions.
  • Choose review and QA based on risk rather than ceremony.
  • Keep durable project state concise and current.

Dev

  • Follow repository conventions and implement the smallest complete solution.
  • Run relevant checks and inspect the final diff.
  • Open or update the pull request with summary, verification, and limitations.

QA

  • Use only when dedicated behavioral verification adds value.
  • Test the requested change and important regressions.
  • Report reproducible findings and verify fixes.

Brainstorms

Use the brainstorm format for product or architecture decisions that benefit from competing perspectives. For ordinary implementation choices, let Dev decide using repository conventions.

Context Recovery

Before ending a long or interrupted session:

  1. Update the active plan or progress note if one exists.
  2. Record material decisions, blockers, and the next action in repository context.
  3. Use a cold-start prompt such as:
Read the repository instructions, then read whichever sources exist for this
work: the active issue or request, PROJECT_BRIEF.md, and the active plan or
progress note.
Continue from the recorded next action.

Tool and Model Inheritance

The bundled agents intentionally omit tools and model frontmatter:

  • available built-in, MCP, and extension tools remain usable;
  • developers keep control of model selection;
  • role boundaries are defined by instructions and normal trust, permission, authentication, and approval controls.

If the environment exposes too many tools, deselect irrelevant tools or MCP servers, or use VS Code virtual-tool management. Do not add a machine-specific plugin allowlist.

Principles

  • Prefer working software and clear handoffs over process artifacts.
  • Follow repository policy instead of embedding universal Git commands.
  • Preserve unknown work and ask before destructive or privileged actions.
  • Keep bugs and important decisions in durable project systems, not only chat.
  • See anti-patterns for concise lessons.

相似的 Skill

skill-creator
官方
anthropics/skills180k

skill-creator

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

测试

test-driven-development
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

test-driven-development

Drives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.

测试

interview-me
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

interview-me

Extracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.

测试

idea-refine
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

idea-refine

Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".

测试

doubt-driven-development
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

doubt-driven-development

Subjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.

测试

debugging-and-error-recovery
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

debugging-and-error-recovery

Guides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, something that worked yesterday broke, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need to figure out what broke and why — a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.

测试