跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

code-health-check

Perform a comprehensive code health check on a directory. Use when the user asks to analyze code quality, find issues, or get a health report.

代码质量与审查1.1k04-Skills/projects/07-skill-fork-demo/.claude/skills/code-health-check/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/huangjia2019/claude-code-engineering/code-health-check/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Code Health Check

Analyze the codebase at $ARGUMENTS and produce a structured health report.

Checks to Perform

1. File Organization

  • Are files reasonably sized? (Flag files > 200 lines)
  • Is the directory structure logical?
  • Any files that look misplaced?

2. Error Handling

  • Are async operations wrapped in try/catch?
  • Are errors propagated correctly (not swallowed)?
  • Is there a global error handler?

3. Security Basics

  • Any hardcoded secrets, API keys, or passwords?
  • Any use of eval() or similar dangerous functions?
  • Are user inputs validated before use?

4. Code Quality

  • Any obvious code duplication (similar blocks in multiple files)?
  • Any unused variables or imports?
  • Are function signatures reasonable (not too many parameters)?

5. Dependency Hygiene

  • Are all imported modules actually used?
  • Any circular dependencies?

Severity Levels

Use these to categorize issues:

SeverityMeaningExample
CRITICALMust fix immediatelyHardcoded secrets, SQL injection
WARNINGShould fix soonMissing error handling, large files
INFONice to improveMinor duplication, naming conventions

Output Format

Return a structured report in this exact format:

# Code Health Report: {directory}

## Overall Score: {A/B/C/D/F}

## Summary
- Files analyzed: {count}
- Issues found: {critical} critical, {warning} warnings, {info} info

## Critical Issues
{list each with file:line and description}

## Warnings
{list each with file:line and description}

## Info
{list each with file:line and description}

## Recommendations
{top 3 actionable recommendations}

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查