跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

cloud-architect

Designs cloud architectures, creates migration plans, generates cost optimization recommendations, and produces disaster recovery strategies across AWS, Azure, and GCP. Use when designing cloud architectures, planning migrations, or optimizing multi-cloud deployments. Invoke for Well-Architected Framework, cost optimization, disaster recovery, landing zones, security architecture, serverless design.

安全12kskills/cloud-architect/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/jeffallan/claude-skills/cloud-architect/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Cloud Architect

Core Workflow

  1. Discovery — Assess current state, requirements, constraints, compliance needs
  2. Design — Select services, design topology, plan data architecture
  3. Security — Implement zero-trust, identity federation, encryption
  4. Cost Model — Right-size resources, reserved capacity, auto-scaling
  5. Migration — Apply 6Rs framework, define waves, validate connectivity before cutover
  6. Operate — Set up monitoring, automation, continuous optimization

Workflow Validation Checkpoints

After Design: Confirm every component has a redundancy strategy and no single points of failure exist in the topology.

Before Migration cutover: Validate VPC peering or connectivity is fully established:

# AWS: confirm peering connection is Active before proceeding
aws ec2 describe-vpc-peering-connections \
  --filters "Name=status-code,Values=active"

# Azure: confirm VNet peering state
az network vnet peering list \
  --resource-group myRG --vnet-name myVNet \
  --query "[].{Name:name,State:peeringState}"

After Migration: Verify application health and routing:

# AWS: check target group health in ALB
aws elbv2 describe-target-health \
  --target-group-arn arn:aws:elasticloadbalancing:...

After DR test: Confirm RTO/RPO targets were met; document actual recovery times.

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
AWS Servicesreferences/aws.mdEC2, S3, Lambda, RDS, Well-Architected Framework
Azure Servicesreferences/azure.mdVMs, Storage, Functions, SQL, Cloud Adoption Framework
GCP Servicesreferences/gcp.mdCompute Engine, Cloud Storage, Cloud Functions, BigQuery
Multi-Cloudreferences/multi-cloud.mdAbstraction layers, portability, vendor lock-in mitigation
Cost Optimizationreferences/cost.mdReserved instances, spot, right-sizing, FinOps practices

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Design for high availability (99.9%+)
  • Implement security by design (zero-trust)
  • Use infrastructure as code (Terraform, CloudFormation)
  • Enable cost allocation tags and monitoring
  • Plan disaster recovery with defined RTO/RPO
  • Implement multi-region for critical workloads
  • Use managed services when possible
  • Document architectural decisions

MUST NOT DO

  • Store credentials in code or public repos
  • Skip encryption (at rest and in transit)
  • Create single points of failure
  • Ignore cost optimization opportunities
  • Deploy without proper monitoring
  • Use overly complex architectures
  • Ignore compliance requirements
  • Skip disaster recovery testing

Common Patterns with Examples

Least-Privilege IAM (Zero-Trust)

Rather than broad policies, scope permissions to specific resources and actions:

# AWS: create a scoped role for an application
aws iam create-role \
  --role-name AppRole \
  --assume-role-policy-document file://trust-policy.json

aws iam put-role-policy \
  --role-name AppRole \
  --policy-name AppInlinePolicy \
  --policy-document '{
    "Version": "2012-10-17",
    "Statement": [{
      "Effect": "Allow",
      "Action": ["s3:GetObject", "s3:PutObject"],
      "Resource": "arn:aws:s3:::my-app-bucket/*"
    }]
  }'
# Terraform equivalent
resource "aws_iam_role" "app_role" {
  name               = "AppRole"
  assume_role_policy = data.aws_iam_policy_document.trust.json
}

resource "aws_iam_role_policy" "app_policy" {
  role = aws_iam_role.app_role.id
  policy = jsonencode({
    Version = "2012-10-17"
    Statement = [{
      Effect   = "Allow"
      Action   = ["s3:GetObject", "s3:PutObject"]
      Resource = "${aws_s3_bucket.app.arn}/*"
    }]
  })
}

VPC with Public/Private Subnets (Terraform)

resource "aws_vpc" "main" {
  cidr_block           = "10.0.0.0/16"
  enable_dns_hostnames = true
  tags = { Name = "main", CostCenter = var.cost_center }
}

resource "aws_subnet" "private" {
  count             = 2
  vpc_id            = aws_vpc.main.id
  cidr_block        = cidrsubnet("10.0.0.0/16", 8, count.index)
  availability_zone = data.aws_availability_zones.available.names[count.index]
}

resource "aws_subnet" "public" {
  count                   = 2
  vpc_id                  = aws_vpc.main.id
  cidr_block              = cidrsubnet("10.0.0.0/16", 8, count.index + 10)
  availability_zone       = data.aws_availability_zones.available.names[count.index]
  map_public_ip_on_launch = true
}

Auto-Scaling Group (Terraform)

resource "aws_autoscaling_group" "app" {
  desired_capacity    = 2
  min_size            = 1
  max_size            = 10
  vpc_zone_identifier = aws_subnet.private[*].id

  launch_template {
    id      = aws_launch_template.app.id
    version = "$Latest"
  }

  tag {
    key                 = "CostCenter"
    value               = var.cost_center
    propagate_at_launch = true
  }
}

resource "aws_autoscaling_policy" "cpu_target" {
  autoscaling_group_name = aws_autoscaling_group.app.name
  policy_type            = "TargetTrackingScaling"
  target_tracking_configuration {
    predefined_metric_specification {
      predefined_metric_type = "ASGAverageCPUUtilization"
    }
    target_value = 60.0
  }
}

Cost Analysis CLI

# AWS: identify top cost drivers for the last 30 days
aws ce get-cost-and-usage \
  --time-period Start=$(date -d '30 days ago' +%Y-%m-%d),End=$(date +%Y-%m-%d) \
  --granularity MONTHLY \
  --metrics "UnblendedCost" \
  --group-by Type=DIMENSION,Key=SERVICE \
  --query 'ResultsByTime[0].Groups[*].{Service:Keys[0],Cost:Metrics.UnblendedCost.Amount}' \
  --output table

# Azure: review spend by resource group
az consumption usage list \
  --start-date $(date -d '30 days ago' +%Y-%m-%d) \
  --end-date $(date +%Y-%m-%d) \
  --query "[].{ResourceGroup:resourceGroup,Cost:pretaxCost,Currency:currency}" \
  --output table

Output Templates

When designing cloud architecture, provide:

  1. Architecture diagram with services and data flow
  2. Service selection rationale (compute, storage, database, networking)
  3. Security architecture (IAM, network segmentation, encryption)
  4. Cost estimation and optimization strategy
  5. Deployment approach and rollback plan

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

相似的 Skill

security-and-hardening
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

security-and-hardening

Hardens code against vulnerabilities. Use when auditing an input handler for vulnerabilities, when handling user input, authentication, data storage, or external integrations, or when checking a login flow is safe against the OWASP Top Ten. Use when building any feature that accepts untrusted data, manages user sessions, or interacts with third-party services. Use when auditing dependencies for known vulnerabilities, triaging package-manager audit findings, or assessing supply-chain risk in a new package. Use when personal data or privacy compliance (GDPR, CCPA) is involved.

安全

archify
tt-a1i/archify80k

archify

Create polished, validated architecture, workflow, sequence, data-flow, and lifecycle/state diagrams as explorable standalone HTML with inline SVG, dark/light themes, optional trace motion, and PNG/JPEG/WebP/SVG/WebM export. Accept plain-language requirements or pasted Mermaid flowchart, sequenceDiagram, and stateDiagram input; inspect repository evidence when the diagram must reflect real code. Use when the user asks to visualize system architecture, infrastructure, cloud/security/network topology, technical workflows, API call sequences, request lifecycles, data pipelines, ETL/ELT, data lineage, state machines, or to convert/beautify Mermaid. Also use for everyday subjects with steps, parts, relationships, or states: a leave or travel plan, an application or approval process, a back-and-forth such as renting, where money or documents go, or where an application or order stands. Not for numeric charts or dashboards.

安全

security-research
code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent70k

security-research

Team Mode security research skill. Orchestrates 3 vulnerability hunters and 2 PoC engineers to audit a codebase in parallel, prove exploitability, classify root causes, and calibrate severity by actual exploitability. Use for security review, vulnerability research, exploitability audit, pre-release security check, threat model validation, and `/security-research`. Triggers: 'security-research', 'security research', 'security review', 'vulnerability audit', 'exploitability audit', '보안 리뷰', '취약점 감사'.

安全

007
sickn33/agentic-awesome-skills47k

007

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

安全

open-code-review
alibaba/open-code-review45k

open-code-review

Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the `ocr` CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply fixes when requested. With appropriate review rules, can detect various types of issues including bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance problems, and code quality concerns.

安全

open-code-review
alibaba/open-code-review45k

open-code-review

Performs AI-powered code review on Git changes using the `ocr` CLI from alibaba/open-code-review. Use when the user asks to review code, review a pull request, review staged/unstaged changes, review a commit, or compare branches for code quality issues. Produces line-level review comments and can automatically apply fixes when requested. With appropriate review rules, can detect various types of issues including bugs, security vulnerabilities, performance problems, and code quality concerns.

安全