跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

choosing-a-workflow

Use at the start of new project onboarding, PR lifecycle work including PR checks, or changes that require choosing product scope, user-visible behavior, or architecture. Not for continuing work already routed to a workflow, non-PR questions, checks, explanations, or localized fully specified work.

代码质量与审查513packages/pi-thinkrail-workflow/skills/choosing-a-workflow/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/jetbrains/thinkrail/choosing-a-workflow/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Choosing a Workflow

The root router of the workflow family in packages/pi-thinkrail-workflow. It classifies new workflow-eligible work and names the workflow skill that governs it — nothing more. Work already routed resumes its active workflow instead. A routed skill's steps live in that skill alone; read it, don't run it from memory.

Classify

For a new piece of work, read the request and use what is already known to answer three questions:

  1. Is this project onboarding? No spec graph yet — an empty or effectively empty workspace where the user brings a raw idea, or an existing codebase being set up or specced for the first time.
  2. Is this the PR lifecycle? Finished work shipping as a pull request, or an existing PR being tended — created, brought up to date, given screenshots, its checks watched, or its review comments addressed. Fixes that flow from a PR's own review comments belong here.
  3. Does the work require a product or design choice? The request leaves scope, user-visible behavior, or architecture to decide before implementation.

If none applies, no workflow is needed: proceed directly without a workflow announcement. A fully specified fix, mechanical refactor, documentation or configuration-only change, question, explanation, or check normally belongs here.

If the route is genuinely ambiguous from the request alone, ask one short clarifying question (ask_user_question, composed per the asking-user-questions concept skill) rather than guessing.

Route

ClassificationRoute
Project onboarding — no spec graph yetRead and follow setting-up-a-project
PR lifecycle workRead and follow shipping-a-pr
A change requiring a product or design choiceRead and follow brainstorming
None of the aboveNo matching workflow; proceed directly without announcing the routing result

One route per piece of work. If a request bundles unfinished implementation with PR work, route the implementation first and return to shipping-a-pr only after it lands.

Red flags — stop and re-route

  • You started implementation while a required product or architecture choice is still unresolved.
  • You loaded brainstorming for work whose observable result and implementation constraints are already specified.
  • You re-entered this router while continuing work already assigned to a workflow.
  • You are following a routed skill's steps from memory instead of reading that skill.

Handoff

This skill ends by naming exactly one of: setting-up-a-project, shipping-a-pr, brainstorming, or no matching workflow (proceed directly). Adding a workflow to the family adds a row to the table above — see the writing-workflow-skills skill.

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查