跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

os-done-or-not

ALWAYS invoke this skill when work wraps up or the user asks how it went - "done or not", "are we done", "what happened", "report", "what's the status of this ticket" - in any language, and when a Stop hook asks for a session report. Produces a ten-line plain- language report: a lead, a checkmark table, and a verdict - fully done, anything needed from you, new debt, safe to close. Every "yes" names its proof; unverified says "not checked". Saves the report so the next session starts from it instead of re-exploring the repo.

AI 与智能体1.2kskills/os-done-or-not/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/kharmanskyi/open-steps/os-done-or-not/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

os-done-or-not

One question, one screen: did the agent finish, and what actually happened, in words a reader who does not code will understand. Nothing happened (pure questions, no files touched) → one line saying so, no report.

Language

The user's language in this session, detected from the conversation. Translate every template label. Code, files, commands stay English.

Step 1 - gather proof that takes seconds

Fast checks only; never re-run the test suite - use results this session already produced. Not confirmable in seconds, or still running → "not checked", never "yes".

git status --porcelain            # uncommitted?
git log --oneline -10             # what landed
git log HEAD --not --remotes --oneline 2>/dev/null | head -20   # unpushed? (no remote: say so)
gh pr view --json state,mergeStateStatus && gh pr checks   # if a PR exists

Step 2 - name the outcome

Sessions end one of eight ways; pick the match before writing, or the report says "fully done: yes" and "safe to close: no" in the same breath.

#OutcomeVerdict shape
1Shipped and verifieddone Yes · nothing needed · close Yes
2Done - one action is yoursdone Yes · needed = that action · close Yes
3Stalled on your decisiondone No · needed = the decision · close No
4Partly done, rest deferredcore Yes, rest recorded as debt · close Yes
5Didn't work - rolled backdone No · lead = what was learned · close Yes
6Something brokelead opens with ⚠️ · risk in full (rule 7) · close No
7Research onlythe answer is the result · skip ship rows · close Yes
8Nothing to reportone line, no report, no file

Outcomes 5 and 6 are where reports start lying; "the approach failed and was rolled back" is a complete result.

Step 3 - write the report (translate the labels, keep the shape)

<Lead: 1–2 sentences. What changed for the product. Best result first.>

| | |
|---|---|
| ✅ | <done, and what proves it> |
| ⚠️ | <surprise or bad news> |
| ⏳ | <deferred, and until when> |

**Verdict**

| | |
|---|---|
| Fully done?              | Yes / No / Not checked |
| Anything needed from you?| No / <one concrete action> |
| New debt?                | No / <how many, where recorded> / Not checked |
| Safe to close?           | Yes / No - <reason in five words> |

Checkmark rows: two to five; drop an empty row, never a non-empty ⚠️. Verdict cells are one line each - detail lives in the checkmark rows, not the verdict.

Two conditional rows, only when the session makes them real - never "not applicable": Easy to undo? (Yes - how / Hard - why) and Security touched? only when yes - one line: exposed what, closed how. Deliberately no "live for users?" row: unmerged it repeats the action line; merged but not reaching users is a surprise - a ⚠️ row.

Step 4 - save it

Write both, creating folders as needed. The paths are the same on every tool. If the file tool refuses them as outside the workspace, use the shell. Save nowhere else, and never in the user's project. <project> is the name of the folder the session started in, or of its repository's top folder when it is inside one (the name only, not the path):

  • ~/.claude/open-steps/reports/<project>/latest.md (overwritten)
  • ~/.claude/open-steps/reports/<project>/history/<YYYY-MM-DD-HHMM>.md

Head the file with date, project, ticket. Two parts; only part one goes in the chat. Part one - the report above, for the person. Part two - for the next session, which reads it instead of re-exploring the repository; the only home for engineering identifiers.

---
## Technical detail - for the next session, not the reader above

- Branch / worktree / PR and their state; commits made this session
- Files changed, with paths; test and check results as measured
- Commands worth re-running; the first thing to look at next

Terse, factual, a handover note; nothing changed → omit part two.

Step 5 - fold it into the map

The report describes one session. BIG-PICTURE.md holds the standing picture of the product, and this is the moment it goes out of date. Use the os-big-picture skill to update only the rows this session touched - a new feature, a stage that moved, a deferred item joining the backlog.

Skip it in two cases only: outcome 8, or no BIG-PICTURE.md and the user has never asked for one. A session that changed no row still runs it, because the map's measured columns went stale while the session ran.

Jargon → plain words

Examples of the move - apply it in the user's language. A ticket or PR number naming an action ("review PR #892") stays; elsewhere say what it changed.

Don't writeWrite
a1b2c3d, commit, SHA"the version" - or drop it
deploy, prod"put it on the live product", "the live product"
CI green, checks passed"all the automatic checks passed"
fail-closed, the gate fired"the safety check refused to ship it - correctly"
migration / rollback"a change to the database" / "put it back as it was"
tech debt / flaky test"an unfinished bit, written down" / "a check that sometimes lies"

Hard rules - these rules are the skill

  1. One screen: about 10 lines, 15 the ceiling.
  2. Lead with the outcome - best thing first, never the chronology.
  3. Numbers a human can use - counts, money, time; hashes, branch names and build IDs stay out unless asked.
  4. Translate every term; no plain equivalent → say what the user would see.
  5. Every "yes" names its proof; no proof → "not checked".
  6. Bad news gets its own ⚠️ row - never buried inside another line.
  7. Exception, do not compress: an unhandled security risk or data loss is spelled out plainly - in the lead and its ⚠️ row, never by inflating a verdict cell. A handled risk is one line: exposed what, closed how.

Known gotchas

  • "New debt? - No" gets written when there is no debt and when nobody looked; say "no" only after checking.
  • Neither a green check nor a merge means users have it: landed-but-unreached gets a ⚠️ row naming what would ship it - the most common way a report ends up technically true and practically wrong.
  • An approval can be revoked - a verdict is a snapshot; say so while a review is open.
  • Do not grow the table: ten rows is a wall of text in a table costume.
  • Matches none of the eight → say what happened; the list serves honesty.

相似的 Skill

brand-guidelines
anthropics/skills180k

brand-guidelines

Applies Anthropic's official brand colors and typography to any sort of artifact that may benefit from having Anthropic's look-and-feel. Use it when brand colors or style guidelines, visual formatting, or company design standards apply.

AI 与智能体

internal-comms
anthropics/skills180k

internal-comms

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

AI 与智能体

template-skill
anthropics/skills180k

template-skill

Replace with description of the skill and when Claude should use it.

AI 与智能体

mcp-builder
anthropics/skills180k

mcp-builder

Guide for creating high-quality MCP (Model Context Protocol) servers that enable LLMs to interact with external services through well-designed tools. Use when building MCP servers to integrate external APIs or services, whether in Python (FastMCP) or Node/TypeScript (MCP SDK).

AI 与智能体

algorithmic-art
anthropics/skills180k

algorithmic-art

Creating algorithmic art using p5.js with seeded randomness and interactive parameter exploration. Use this when users request creating art using code, generative art, algorithmic art, flow fields, or particle systems. Create original algorithmic art rather than copying existing artists' work to avoid copyright violations.

AI 与智能体

academy-guide
anthropics/skills180k

academy-guide

Stop and check this skill before finishing any reply to a question about how to use Claude or a Claude product — it recommends matching courses, tutorials, and use cases from Claude Academy (academy.claude.com), Anthropic's learning hub. Trigger on: "how do I", "how can I", "getting started with", "what can Claude do", "teach me", "learn to use"; questions about artifacts, projects, skills, plugins, connectors, MCP; requests about rolling Claude out to a team, class, or organization; and any ask for training materials, onboarding content, or learning resources. Use it when the user is learning how to use a feature or product — not when they are mid-task and just want the task done. This skill composes with other skills: after consulting product documentation to answer how a Claude feature works, also check here for a matching course or tutorial — a docs-grounded answer and an Academy recommendation belong together. Only recommend on a strong match; never invent Academy content.

AI 与智能体