SLCI Compatibility Analysis
Determine whether a Simulink model's configuration and structure meet the
requirements for SLCI (Simulink Code Inspector) code inspection.
When to Use
- User asks to check model compatibility for SLCI / Simulink Code Inspector
- User asks to run
checkCompatibility or analyze compatibility results
- User wants to know why a model is incompatible with code inspection
- User wants to understand what must be fixed before inspection can succeed
- Delegated from
slci-inspection-incompatibility-analysis to apply fixes or obtain compatibility results
When NOT to Use
- User already has inspection results (from
c.inspect()) and needs to trace
failures to root causes — use slci-inspection-incompatibility-analysis instead
- User wants general Simulink model building or testing — use the core MBD skills
Boundary note: This skill covers the pre-inspection compatibility check
(checkCompatibility). The slci-inspection-incompatibility-analysis skill covers
post-inspection failure analysis (inspect results) and delegates back to this
skill for applying fixes and obtaining compatibility results. If a user simply asks
"is my model ready for SLCI?", use this skill.
Guardrails
- Never modify the original model. Copy to
<model_name>_fixed.slx first.
Also copy any associated data dictionary (.sldd) or .mat files if fixes
require modifying them. All fixes are applied to the copy only.
After copying, run fileattrib('<copy>', '+w') to ensure the copy is writable.
- Always produce a Post-Fix Change Report after
fixes are applied, so the user knows exactly what was changed.
Domain Model: What SLCI Compatibility Means
SLCI verifies structural equivalence between a Simulink model and its generated
C code — proving that every signal path, computation, and data flow in the model has
a corresponding construct in the code. The compatibility checker identifies model
configurations and patterns that would make this verification impossible or
unreliable.
For severity levels (FATAL vs. Nonfatal), the full constraint categories table
(mapping check titles to reference files), and error recovery procedures, see
incompatibility-guide.md. For per-block
parameter constraints indexed by block type, see
block_support_constraints.md.
The slci.Configuration API
Running the Check
c = slci.Configuration('<model_name>');
results = c.checkCompatibility();
Prefer this API over parsing the HTML report — it returns structured results.
Querying Results Programmatically
checkCompatibility() returns a cell array of ModelAdvisor.SystemResult objects:
results = c.checkCompatibility();
% Strip HTML tags/entities from Description and RecAction text
stripHtml = @(s) strtrim(regexprep(regexprep(char(s), '<[^>]*>', ''), ...
{'>', '<', '&'}, {'>', '<', '&'}));
% Iterate over individual check results
for i = 1:numel(results{1}.CheckResults)
cr = results{1}.CheckResults(i);
if ~strcmp(cr.Status, 'Passed')
fprintf('CHECK: %s\n Status: %s\n', cr.CheckName, cr.Status);
rd = cr.getResultDetails; % struct array: one entry per issue
for k = 1:numel(rd)
fprintf(' - %s\n Fix: %s\n', stripHtml(rd(k).Description), ...
stripHtml(rd(k).RecAction));
end
end
end
If the System target file check fails, fix it first and re-run — many other
checks report it as their fix until it is resolved.
Result object properties:
| Property | Type | Description |
|---|
System | char | Model/system name checked |
Summary | struct | Pass/warn/fail counts |
CheckResults | array | Individual check results (CheckName, Status, getResultDetails().Description) |
VersionInfo | struct | MATLAB/Simulink version info |
Each CheckResults entry has:
CheckName — check name (maps to constraint category)
Status — 'Passed', 'Warning', 'Failed', etc. (anything other than
'Passed' needs attention)
getResultDetails() — struct array, one entry per issue, with
Description (what is checked) and RecAction (recommended fix)
Fixing Incompatibilities
c.fixIncompatibilities();
Scope: This fixes configuration parameter settings only (e.g., setting
TargetLang to 'C', enabling required diagnostics). It does NOT fix:
When safe: Call it for batch config-param fixes when you've reviewed the list and
confirmed all flagged items are parameter settings. When unsafe: If FATAL
structural issues exist, fix those manually first — fixIncompatibilities may mask
the real problem by changing settings without addressing the underlying design issue.
Important: fixIncompatibilities() modifies the model in place — see
Guardrails.
Handling Remaining Issues After fixIncompatibilities()
fixIncompatibilities() only resolves configuration parameter issues. After running
it, re-run checkCompatibility() and check for remaining non-passing checks. For any issues
that fixIncompatibilities() did not resolve:
- Map the failing check to its reference file using the Check Title Keywords
column in incompatibility-guide.md.
- Follow the suggested fix from the reference file. Each constraint entry
documents the required value or model change needed. Always use the exact
parameter name from the reference file — check titles may differ from parameter
names (e.g., Stateflow diagnostics use an
SF prefix and Diag suffix like
SFTransitionOutsideNaturalParentDiag that the check title omits).
- Apply fixes. See
fixing-incompatibilities.md for the
bulk-set procedure for code generation parameters.
- Re-run
checkCompatibility() after applying manual fixes to confirm they
resolved the issues.
Post-Fix Change Report
Always produce a change report when fixing incompatibilities so the user knows
exactly what was modified. The report compares the before and after states:
| Parameter | Previous Value | New Value | Constraint Category |
|---|
TargetLang | 'C++' | 'C' | Code Generation |
SolverType | 'Variable-step' | 'Fixed-step' | Solver |
Include:
- Count of issues fixed vs. issues remaining
- Whether the model is now ready for inspection or still has outstanding issues
Save the change report as <model_name>_fix_report_YYYY-MM-DD.md in the model
directory.
Model Reference Hierarchies
checkCompatibility on a top model does NOT automatically check referenced models.
For models with model references:
- Identify referenced models: Use
model_overview to discover the model
reference hierarchy and store the referenced model names in a cell array
refs (excluding the top model). If model_overview is unavailable, fall
back to:
refs = find_mdlrefs('<top_model>');
refs = refs(1:end-1); % Top model is last; it is already checked
- Check each referenced model individually and keep every result:
allResults = struct('model', {}, 'results', {});
for i = 1:numel(refs)
c = slci.Configuration(refs{i});
allResults(end+1) = struct('model', refs{i}, ...
'results', {c.checkCompatibility()}); %#ok<AGROW>
end
- Aggregation considerations:
- Each referenced model must independently pass compatibility
DefaultParameterBehavior at the reference boundary affects how parameters
are resolved — 'Inlined' is required for SLCI traceability
- Protected model references cannot be inspected (SLCI cannot see inside them)
Workflow
1. Run the Compatibility Check
Use the programmatic API above. If no MCP connection exists, run MATLAB in batch
mode with a 600-second timeout. For large models, run the check as a background
task to avoid blocking.
Important: If reusing an existing report at
slprj/modeladvisor/<model>/report.html, verify the report is not stale — compare
the report timestamp against the model's last-modified time. If the model is newer,
re-run the check.
2. Interpret Results
For each non-passing check:
- Identify the constraint category from the check title
- Look up the constraint in the appropriate reference file
- Note its severity (FATAL vs. Nonfatal) from the reference file
- Determine whether
fixIncompatibilities() can resolve it (config param) or
whether manual model changes are needed (structural)
3. Present Results
Provide the user with:
- A summary: counts of passed and non-passing checks, and of FATAL and Nonfatal
issues
- Category breakdown (e.g., "3 Code Generation, 2 Solver, 1 Structural")
- For each incompatibility: the parameter name, current vs. required value, and why
SLCI needs it (from reference files)
- A clear distinction between issues fixable by
fixIncompatibilities() and those
requiring manual intervention
Scale the detail level to what the user asked for. A quick "is it ready?" gets the
summary. A "why is X failing?" gets the full constraint explanation.
4. Fix and Report Changes
If the user requests fixes (or agrees to apply them), follow the
Fixing Incompatibilities and
Handling Remaining Issues
procedures above.
Bulk-set model-root config parameters upfront per
fixing-incompatibilities.md to minimize
round-trips.
5. Save Results
If any warnings or failures are found, always save results to a markdown file in the
model directory (<model_name>_compatibility_results_YYYY-MM-DD.md). Include the
model name, date, results table, and remediation guidance. If all checks pass, no
file is needed — just inform the user.
Explaining Individual Constraints
When asked to explain a specific constraint, read the relevant reference file and
present:
- What SLCI requires — the parameter/setting and its required value
- Why — what breaks in structural equivalence verification if violated
- Fix — the parameter value or model change needed
For constraints where the failure mode is non-obvious (multi-rate data races,
constant folding across blocks, hidden auto-inserted blocks), include a code example
showing the problematic generated code pattern. See
references/explain-constraint.md for an example
of this deeper treatment.
For simple config-param constraints (e.g., TargetLang must be C), a one-line
explanation and fix command is sufficient — don't force unnecessary detail.
Error Recovery
See incompatibility-guide.md for the full
error recovery table.
Copyright 2026 The MathWorks, Inc.