跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

ml-training-recipes

Battle-tested PyTorch training recipes for all domains — LLMs, vision, diffusion, medical imaging, protein/drug discovery, spatial omics, genomics. Covers training loops, optimizer selection (AdamW, Muon), LR scheduling, mixed precision, debugging, and systematic experimentation. Use when training or fine-tuning neural networks, debugging loss spikes or OOM, choosing architectures, or optimizing GPU throughput.

代码质量与审查1.3kskills/vendor-ai-research/ml-training-recipes/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/openraiser/nanoresearch/ml-training-recipes/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

ML Training Recipes

Battle-tested patterns for PyTorch training across domains. Drawn from production codebases (Karpathy's autoresearch/nanochat, torchvision, HuggingFace) and modern training practice.

Reference files (read when needed)

  • references/architecture.md — Transformer/LLM architecture code patterns, weight init
  • references/optimizers.md — Muon, AdamW hybrid, per-group LR, compiled optimizer steps
  • references/domain-specific.md — Vision, diffusion, contrastive, distributed, checkpointing, data loading
  • references/scaling-and-selection.md — Scaling laws, compute budget tables, decision trees, DGX Spark
  • references/biomedical.md — Drug discovery, protein models, medical imaging, genomics, clinical NLP
  • references/experiment-loop.md — Autonomous experiment loop (autoresearch keep/discard/revert)

Architecture Selection

Pick the right model by data type and data scale:

Data Type< 10K samples10K-100K> 100K
ImagesPretrained CNN + fine-tuneFine-tune ViT or CNNViT from scratch
Text (gen)Few-shot promptingFine-tune GPT/LLaMA (LoRA)Pretrain from scratch
TabularXGBoost/LightGBMStill XGBoostNeural viable
AudioPretrained WhisperFine-tune ASTTrain from scratch
MoleculesPretrained GNNFine-tune molecular LMTrain GNN from scratch
ProteinsESM-2 embeddings + headFine-tune ESM-2Train protein LM
Medical imgPretrained CNNnnU-Net (auto-config)Swin-UNETR / MedSAM

Key principle: architecture matters less than training recipe at equal compute. A well-tuned ResNet beats a poorly-tuned ViT (ref: "ResNet Strikes Back", Wightman 2021).

For biomedical domains, see references/biomedical.md. For sequence model selection and compute planning, see references/scaling-and-selection.md.


Scaling Laws

Chinchilla rule (Hoffmann et al., 2022)

Compute-optimal training: ~20 tokens per parameter.

Model SizeCompute-OptimalInference-Optimal (100×)
125M2.5B tokens12.5B tokens
1B20B tokens100B tokens
7B140B tokens700B tokens

FLOPs ≈ 6 × N × D (N=params, D=tokens). Data repetition limit: ~4 epochs before diminishing returns.


Training Loop

import gc, time, torch

torch.manual_seed(42)
torch.set_float32_matmul_precision("high")  # TF32 on Ampere+
autocast_ctx = torch.amp.autocast(device_type="cuda", dtype=torch.bfloat16)

grad_accum_steps = total_batch_size // (batch_size * seq_len)
step = 0

while not done:
    t0 = time.time()
    for micro_step in range(grad_accum_steps):
        with autocast_ctx:
            loss = model(x, y)
        (loss / grad_accum_steps).backward()
        x, y = next(train_loader)

    update_lr(optimizer, progress)
    optimizer.step()
    model.zero_grad(set_to_none=True)  # frees memory vs zeroing

    if loss.item() > 100:  # fast-fail on divergence
        print("FAIL: loss exploded"); exit(1)

    torch.cuda.synchronize()
    if step == 0:
        gc.collect(); gc.freeze(); gc.disable()  # avoid ~500ms GC stalls
    step += 1

Key principles

  • Gradient clipping: clip_grad_norm_(params, 1.0) — near-universal for Transformers. Exception: Muon optimizer normalizes updates via orthogonalization, so clipping is optional.
  • Tensor Core alignment: batch size, hidden dims should be multiples of 8 (bf16) or 64 (A100).
  • Time-based budgets make experiments comparable across hardware.
  • cudnn.benchmark = True for fixed-size vision inputs.

Optimizer Configuration

Modern LLM training uses different optimizers per parameter group:

Parameter TypeOptimizerLR (base)Weight Decay
2D weight matricesMuon0.040.2
Token embeddingsAdamW0.6 × scale0.0
Unembedding (lm_head)AdamW0.004 × scale0.0
Per-layer scalarsAdamW0.005 × scale0.0

LR scaling by dimension: lr * (d_model / 768)^(-0.5) — keeps dynamics stable across sizes.

Rules of thumb

  • Embeddings need higher LR (sparse updates). Never weight-decay embeddings.
  • Weight decay scheduling: linearly decay WD to 0 over training.
  • AdamW defaults: β1=0.9, β2=0.95, eps=1e-10 (not default 1e-8 — prevents stale updates in bf16).

For Muon details (polar express orthogonalization, NorMuon), see references/optimizers.md.


Learning Rate Scheduling

Time-based (autoresearch style)

def get_lr_multiplier(progress):  # progress = elapsed_time / time_budget
    if progress < warmup_ratio:
        return progress / warmup_ratio
    elif progress < 1.0 - warmdown_ratio:
        return 1.0
    else:
        cooldown = (1.0 - progress) / warmdown_ratio
        return cooldown + (1 - cooldown) * final_lr_frac

Cosine decay

def get_lr(step, total_steps, max_lr, min_lr, warmup_steps):
    if step < warmup_steps:
        return max_lr * step / warmup_steps
    progress = (step - warmup_steps) / (total_steps - warmup_steps)
    return min_lr + 0.5 * (max_lr - min_lr) * (1 + math.cos(math.pi * progress))

WSD (Warmup-Stable-Decay): gaining traction — easier to resume training mid-run.

Guidance

  • Warmup: 1-5% of training. Zero warmup valid with Muon (autoresearch uses WARMUP_RATIO=0.0).
  • Warmdown: 30-50% of training in LR decay. Matters more than warmup for final quality.
  • Final LR: 0 or ~10% of peak. Zero is simpler.

Mixed Precision & Compilation

import os
os.environ["PYTORCH_ALLOC_CONF"] = "expandable_segments:True"  # before torch import

import torch
torch.set_float32_matmul_precision("high")
autocast_ctx = torch.amp.autocast(device_type="cuda", dtype=torch.bfloat16)
model = torch.compile(model, dynamic=False)
  • bf16 (Ampere+): same exponent as fp32, no loss scaling needed. Preferred over fp16.
  • fp16: needs GradScaler. Use only on V100 or older.
  • dynamic=False enables max optimization. Add fullgraph=True if no graph breaks.
  • First steps are slow (JIT) — exclude from timing.

Memory & Performance

Meta device init (large models)

with torch.device("meta"):
    model = GPT(config)          # zero memory
model.to_empty(device="cuda")
model.init_weights()

MFU (Model FLOPs Utilization)

achieved_flops = model_flops_per_token * batch_tokens / step_time
mfu = achieved_flops / gpu_peak_flops
# H100 SXM: 989.5 TFLOPS | A100: 312 | RTX 4090: 165

Good targets: >30% decent, >40% good, >50% excellent (single-GPU).

OOM solutions (in order)

  1. Reduce DEVICE_BATCH_SIZE, increase grad_accum_steps
  2. PYTORCH_ALLOC_CONF=expandable_segments:True
  3. model.zero_grad(set_to_none=True)
  4. Meta device init → to_empty
  5. Activation checkpointing: torch.utils.checkpoint.checkpoint()
  6. 8-bit optimizer (bitsandbytes): ~30% savings on optimizer states

Priority order (tune first → last)

  1. Learning rate — most impactful. Always tune first.
  2. Batch size — largest that fits. Speed knob, not quality knob.
  3. Weight decay — 0.01-0.1 for AdamW.
  4. Warmup steps — 1-5% of training.

The 2025 default recipe

SettingValue
OptimizerAdamW (β1=0.9, β2=0.95, eps=1e-10)
Weight decay0.1
LR scheduleCosine decay or WSD
Peak LR3e-4 (scale down for larger models)
Precisionbf16
Grad clippingmax_norm=1.0
NormalizationRMSNorm (pre-norm)
ActivationSwiGLU
Position encodingRoPE
AttentionFlash Attention, optionally GQA

Debugging Checklist

Karpathy's recipe (still canonical)

  1. Become one with the data — visualize, check distributions, verify labels
  2. Get end-to-end running first — verify on a trivial case
  3. Overfit one batch — if you can't, you have a bug
  4. Then regularize — add regularization only after overfitting works
  5. Tune hyperparameters — start with known defaults

Loss exploding / NaN

  1. Reduce LR (3-10× smaller)
  2. Add gradient clipping: clip_grad_norm_(params, 1.0)
  3. Check for inf/nan in inputs
  4. Add logit soft capping: softcap * tanh(logits / softcap)
  5. Add QK-norm in attention
  6. Verify weight init (zero-init output projections?)
  7. Check loss reduction with gradient accumulation (loss / grad_accum_steps)

Slow training / Low MFU

  1. Verify torch.compile is active
  2. Check torch.set_float32_matmul_precision("high")
  3. Pin memory + non_blocking transfers
  4. Profile with torch.profiler
  5. GC stalls? gc.freeze(); gc.disable()
  6. Tensor Core alignment: dims multiples of 8/64

Loss plateau / Slow convergence

  1. LR too low — try 2-5× larger
  2. Warmup too long
  3. Weight decay too high
  4. Verify LR schedule is actually applied (print each step)
  5. Model too small for task

Silent failures

  1. Data leakage between train/val
  2. Wrong preprocessing at inference — augmentation mismatch
  3. Label errors — use cleanlab to detect
  4. Shuffling bugs — correlated batches
  5. Tokenizer mismatch with pretrained model

What to monitor

  • Gradient norms — spike precedes loss spike
  • Per-layer activation stats — reveals exploding/vanishing
  • Dead neurons — >50% zero ReLU = dying ReLU problem
  • Learning rate — verify schedule applied (common silent bug)

Experiment Management

Track experiments in TSV for easy comparison:

commit  val_bpb  memory_gb  status   description
a1b2c3d 0.9979   44.0       keep     baseline
b2c3d4e 0.9932   44.2       keep     increase matrix LR to 0.04
c3d4e5f 1.0050   44.0       discard  switch to GeLU (worse)

Simplicity criterion: all else equal, simpler is better. Removing something and getting equal results is a great outcome. For systematic agent-driven experimentation, see references/experiment-loop.md.

Evaluation metrics by domain

DomainPrimary MetricNotes
LLMBPB (bits per byte)Vocab-size-independent
ClassificationAccuracy / F1Macro-F1 for imbalanced
SegmentationmIoU / DicePer-class IoU reveals weak spots
GenerationFIDNeeds >10k samples
RegressionRMSE / MAELog-transform skewed targets

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查