跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

rwkv-architecture

RNN+Transformer hybrid with O(n) inference. Linear time, infinite context, no KV cache. Train like GPT (parallel), infer like RNN (sequential). Linux Foundation AI project. Production at Windows, Office, NeMo. RWKV-7 (March 2025). Models up to 14B parameters.

代码质量与审查13k01-model-architecture/rwkv/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/orchestra-research/ai-research-skills/rwkv/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

RWKV - Receptance Weighted Key Value

Quick start

RWKV (RwaKuv) combines Transformer parallelization (training) with RNN efficiency (inference).

Installation:

# Install PyTorch
pip install torch --upgrade --extra-index-url https://download.pytorch.org/whl/cu121

# Install dependencies
pip install pytorch-lightning==1.9.5 deepspeed wandb ninja --upgrade

# Install RWKV
pip install rwkv

Basic usage (GPT mode + RNN mode):

import os
from rwkv.model import RWKV

os.environ["RWKV_JIT_ON"] = '1'
os.environ["RWKV_CUDA_ON"] = '1'  # Use CUDA kernel for speed

# Load model
model = RWKV(
    model='/path/to/RWKV-4-Pile-1B5-20220903-8040',
    strategy='cuda fp16'
)

# GPT mode (parallel processing)
out, state = model.forward([187, 510, 1563, 310, 247], None)
print(out.detach().cpu().numpy())  # Logits

# RNN mode (sequential processing, same result)
out, state = model.forward([187, 510], None)  # First 2 tokens
out, state = model.forward([1563], state)      # Next token
out, state = model.forward([310, 247], state)  # Last tokens
print(out.detach().cpu().numpy())  # Same logits as above!

Common workflows

Workflow 1: Text generation (streaming)

Efficient token-by-token generation:

from rwkv.model import RWKV
from rwkv.utils import PIPELINE

model = RWKV(model='RWKV-4-Pile-14B-20230313-ctx8192-test1050', strategy='cuda fp16')
pipeline = PIPELINE(model, "20B_tokenizer.json")

# Initial prompt
prompt = "The future of AI is"
state = None

# Generate token by token
for token in prompt:
    out, state = pipeline.model.forward(pipeline.encode(token), state)

# Continue generation
for _ in range(100):
    out, state = pipeline.model.forward(None, state)
    token = pipeline.sample_logits(out)
    print(pipeline.decode(token), end='', flush=True)

Key advantage: Constant memory per token (no growing KV cache)

Workflow 2: Long context processing (infinite context)

Process million-token sequences:

model = RWKV(model='RWKV-4-Pile-14B', strategy='cuda fp16')

# Process very long document
state = None
long_document = load_document()  # e.g., 1M tokens

# Stream through entire document
for chunk in chunks(long_document, chunk_size=1024):
    out, state = model.forward(chunk, state)

# State now contains information from entire 1M token document
# Memory usage: O(1) (constant, not O(n)!)

Workflow 3: Fine-tuning RWKV

Standard fine-tuning workflow:

# Training script
import pytorch_lightning as pl
from rwkv.model import RWKV
from rwkv.trainer import RWKVTrainer

# Configure model
config = {
    'n_layer': 24,
    'n_embd': 1024,
    'vocab_size': 50277,
    'ctx_len': 1024
}

# Setup trainer
trainer = pl.Trainer(
    accelerator='gpu',
    devices=8,
    precision='bf16',
    strategy='deepspeed_stage_2',
    max_epochs=1
)

# Train
model = RWKV(config)
trainer.fit(model, train_dataloader)

Workflow 4: RWKV vs Transformer comparison

Memory comparison (1M token sequence):

# Transformer (GPT)
# Memory: O(n²) for attention
# KV cache: 1M × hidden_dim × n_layers × 2 (keys + values)
# Example: 1M × 4096 × 24 × 2 = ~400GB (impractical!)

# RWKV
# Memory: O(1) per token
# State: hidden_dim × n_layers = 4096 × 24 = ~400KB
# 1,000,000× more efficient!

Speed comparison (inference):

# Transformer: O(n) per token (quadratic overall)
# First token: 1 computation
# Second token: 2 computations
# ...
# 1000th token: 1000 computations

# RWKV: O(1) per token (linear overall)
# Every token: 1 computation
# 1000th token: 1 computation (same as first!)

When to use vs alternatives

Use RWKV when:

  • Need very long context (100K+ tokens)
  • Want constant memory usage
  • Building streaming applications
  • Need RNN efficiency with Transformer performance
  • Memory-constrained deployment

Key advantages:

  • Linear time: O(n) vs O(n²) for Transformers
  • No KV cache: Constant memory per token
  • Infinite context: No fixed window limit
  • Parallelizable training: Like GPT
  • Sequential inference: Like RNN

Use alternatives instead:

  • Transformers: Need absolute best performance, have compute
  • Mamba: Want state-space models
  • RetNet: Need retention mechanism
  • Hyena: Want convolution-based approach

Common issues

Issue: Out of memory during training

Use gradient checkpointing and DeepSpeed:

trainer = pl.Trainer(
    strategy='deepspeed_stage_3',  # Full ZeRO-3
    precision='bf16'
)

Issue: Slow inference

Enable CUDA kernel:

os.environ["RWKV_CUDA_ON"] = '1'

Issue: Model not loading

Check model path and strategy:

model = RWKV(
    model='/absolute/path/to/model.pth',
    strategy='cuda fp16'  # Or 'cpu fp32' for CPU
)

Issue: State management in RNN mode

Always pass state between forward calls:

# WRONG: State lost
out1, _ = model.forward(tokens1, None)
out2, _ = model.forward(tokens2, None)  # No context from tokens1!

# CORRECT: State preserved
out1, state = model.forward(tokens1, None)
out2, state = model.forward(tokens2, state)  # Has context from tokens1

Advanced topics

Time-mixing and channel-mixing: See references/architecture-details.md for WKV operation, time-decay mechanism, and receptance gates.

State management: See references/state-management.md for att_x_prev, att_kv, ffn_x_prev states, and numerical stability considerations.

RWKV-7 improvements: See references/rwkv7.md for latest architectural improvements (March 2025) and multimodal capabilities.

Hardware requirements

  • GPU: NVIDIA (CUDA 11.6+) or CPU
  • VRAM (FP16):
    • 169M model: 1GB
    • 430M model: 2GB
    • 1.5B model: 4GB
    • 3B model: 8GB
    • 7B model: 16GB
    • 14B model: 32GB
  • Inference: O(1) memory per token
  • Training: Parallelizable like GPT

Performance (vs Transformers):

  • Speed: Similar training, faster inference
  • Memory: 1000× less for long sequences
  • Scaling: Linear vs quadratic

Resources

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail159k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查