跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

deepchat-sdd-cleanup

Use only when a developer explicitly asks to clean, prune, tidy, or organize DeepChat SDD documentation after implementation and validation. Scans docs/features, docs/issues, and docs/architecture; prefers multi-agent review when available; removes completed issue docs when a linked GitHub issue is closed or implementation and validation evidence proves the bug no longer exists, drops stale plans and legacy task files from completed feature or architecture goals, and deletes obsolete feature or architecture docs.

代码质量与审查6.4k.agents/skills/deepchat-sdd-cleanup/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/thinkinaixyz/deepchat/deepchat-sdd-cleanup/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

DeepChat SDD Cleanup

Rule

Run this skill only when the developer explicitly asks for SDD cleanup, documentation tidying, pruning, or removal of completed/stale SDD files. Do not run it as an automatic final step of ordinary feature, bug, architecture, or release work.

Workflow

  1. Inspect docs/spec-driven-dev.md, docs/README.md, and git status.
  2. Inventory docs/features, docs/issues, and docs/architecture with find or rg.
  3. Prefer parallel sub-agent review when available:
    • one pass for docs/features
    • one pass for docs/issues
    • one pass for docs/architecture
    • optional verifier pass over proposed deletes
  4. Apply only changes with clear evidence. Keep a concise keep/delete/update list for handoff.
  5. Validate references after edits.

Cleanup Rules

  • Completed feature or architecture goal: delete plan.md and any legacy tasks.md; keep spec.md only when it still defines a maintained contract, regression guard, platform policy, or architecture decision.
  • Completed issue goal: delete the issue folder when a linked GitHub issue is closed or the implementation and validation evidence prove the bug no longer exists.
  • Removed feature: delete its folder when the product/code path is gone and the spec has no reusable decision record.
  • Obsolete architecture: delete its folder when the module was fully replaced and the doc no longer describes a maintained boundary; otherwise update the spec.
  • Historical feature spec affected by an architecture refactor: update the retained spec instead of leaving contradictory docs.

GitHub Checks

Use gh only when it is installed and authenticated. For linked issue docs, verify closure with gh issue view <number> --json state,url,title when possible. If gh is unavailable, do not delete solely because a GitHub link looks old.

Never Delete

  • Active work with unchecked plan.md steps or legacy tasks.
  • Any document containing unresolved [NEEDS CLARIFICATION].
  • A document referenced by docs/README.md, docs/ARCHITECTURE.md, docs/FLOWS.md, or AGENTS instructions unless the reference is updated in the same change.
  • Runtime baselines or machine-read files unless the cleanup request explicitly covers them.

Validation

  • Run rg -n "plan.md|tasks.md|docs/archives|NEEDS CLARIFICATION" docs AGENTS.md .agents/skills and inspect any stale policy references.
  • Run git status --short.
  • For Markdown-only cleanup, formatting/lint commands are optional unless repository instructions or touched generated files require them.

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail159k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查