Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

coco-loop

Start a safe, governed autonomous loop from a plain-language goal. Use when the user says /coco-loop, "run an autonomous loop", "keep my build green for N hours", "work on X autonomously for a while", or wants a bounded self-improving loop that proposes fixes and never commits on its own. Turns a vague goal into a readable charter the user confirms, then arms and runs the loop propose-only under the coco-loops governance framework.

Git 与发布511skills/coco-loop/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/coco-research/coco/coco-loop/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

coco-loop

Turn a plain-language goal into a governed, propose-only loop. You compile the goal into a charter, the person confirms it, and the loop runs under the coco-loops framework: it proposes changes, a separate verifier judges them, and nothing is committed. The loop stops itself when its lifetime cap of active work is spent.

The framework enforces an immutable constitution underneath every charter. You cannot write a charter that disables the verifier, commits without approval, edits the constitution, sends content to raw public-cloud endpoints, or runs unattended destructive operations. The coco-loops charter command rejects any charter that tries. Do not attempt to work around it. Present the floor to the person as a feature.

Prerequisites

coco-loops must be on the PATH. Install it from coco-research/coco-loops:

git clone https://github.com/coco-research/coco-loops
pip install -e coco-loops

Check with coco-loops --help. If it is missing, tell the person how to install it and stop.

Flow

1. Understand the goal

Read the person's goal. Ask at most one or two clarifying questions, and only when the answer genuinely changes the charter:

  • Which repository or worktree should the loop work in? A loop needs a clean git tree, so a dedicated worktree is strongly recommended (the loop reverts its own changes each cycle and refuses to run on a dirty tree, to avoid clobbering uncommitted work).
  • How long should it run? This becomes the lifetime cap of active work, for example 4h. The clock only advances while the loop is actually working, so a closed laptop or an idle wait does not burn it.

Do not over-question. If the goal is clear, proceed.

2. Compile the charter

Get the exact field list with coco-loops charter --schema, then produce a charter as JSON. Derive the principles from the goal, and add sensible safe defaults. Keep principles readable: they are what the person confirms and what we audit the loop against.

Example, for "keep my frontend build green for the next 4 hours":

{
  "loop_id": "keep-build-green",
  "objective": "Make failing frontend tests pass and keep the build green.",
  "principles": [
    "Only touch code covered by a failing test; keep the diff as small as possible.",
    "If a test is genuinely stale, propose updating it rather than weakening it silently.",
    "Prefer fixing the code over changing the test when a real regression is likely."
  ],
  "guardrails": [
    "No dependency or lockfile changes.",
    "No CI or build-config edits."
  ],
  "context": ["the frontend test suite"],
  "inputs": ["failing tests detected each cycle"],
  "lifetime": "4h",
  "level": "L1"
}

Rules for the charter you produce:

  • level is always L1. New loops are propose-only. Higher maturity is earned through the promotion gate, never declared here.
  • loop_id is a slug: lowercase letters, digits, and hyphens.
  • Give at least one principle. Three to five is usually right.
  • Set lifetime from what the person asked, defaulting to 4h.

3. Show the charter and confirm

Write the charter JSON to a temporary file, then run:

coco-loops charter --from-json <file>

This validates the charter against the constitution floor and prints a readable version. If validation fails, it prints why (with the invariant it violated); fix the charter and try again. Show the rendered charter to the person and ask them to confirm before anything is armed.

4. Install and arm

On confirmation:

coco-loops charter --from-json <file> --install

This writes <loop_id>.contract.md into the loops directory, arms the lifetime cap, and clears the kill-switch. The loop is now defined and armed, propose-only.

5. Give it work and run it

The loop reads tasks from a JSON queue (a list of {"id", "name", "instruction"} objects). Seed the queue with concrete, grounded tasks, for example one task per failing test with the file and the assertion. A loop is only as good as its task list; vague tasks produce no-ops.

Run it in the chosen worktree:

coco-loops run <loop_id> --repo <worktree> --tasks <queue.json>

Each cycle it pops a task, asks the maker (cursor-agent by default) to propose a change, has the verifier judge it, logs the proposal, and reverts the tree. Use --once to run a single cycle first and watch what it does. Recommend a dedicated worktree so the loop's revert can never touch the person's uncommitted work.

6. Monitor and hand back

coco-loops status <loop_id>

shows the recent proposals, the verifier verdicts, and how much of the lifetime is spent. Everything is propose-only: the person reviews the batch of proposals and applies what they want. When the lifetime is spent the loop stops itself. To run another session, re-arm with coco-loops start <loop_id> --for <duration> (or run charter --install again).

What to tell the person

  • The loop proposes, it does not commit. They stay in control of what lands.
  • It stops itself after its lifetime of active work. It will not run forever.
  • The constitution floor is always on and cannot be overridden by a charter.
  • A dedicated worktree keeps their main checkout safe.

Similar Skills

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail160k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Git & releases

git-workflow-and-versioning
addyosmani/agent-skills104k

git-workflow-and-versioning

Structures git workflow practices. Use when making any code change. Use when committing, branching, resolving conflicts, splitting uncommitted work in a messy working tree into clean atomic commits, opening or reviewing a pull request (PR), pushing to a remote, or when you need to organize work across multiple parallel streams. Use when cutting a release, choosing a semantic version bump, tagging, or writing a changelog.

Git & releases

ci-cd-and-automation
addyosmani/agent-skills104k

ci-cd-and-automation

Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test runners in CI, or establish deployment strategies.

Git & releases

github-dashboard
nexu-io/open-design100k

github-dashboard

GitHub repository analytics dashboard — stars, forks, contributors, issues, pull requests, recent activity, and top contributors. Use when the brief asks for a GitHub repo dashboard, open-source growth report, repository health page, or GitHub analytics view.

Git & releases

babysit
thedotmack/claude-mem99k

babysit

Watch a pull request or review cycle until it is ready to merge. Use when asked to babysit, monitor, or keep checking PR comments, reviews, and CI until all actionable issues are resolved.

Git & releases

oh-my-issues
thedotmack/claude-mem99k

oh-my-issues

Cluster a GitHub issue backlog by root cause into a small set of plan-master issues, redirect children with a standardized comment, and bundle architectural-fix PRs that close clusters atomically. Use when an issue tracker has accumulated dozens of reports that share underlying defects, when asked to triage / consolidate / cluster / dedupe issues, when asked to build a plan series or roadmap from open issues, or when routing a new incoming bug into an existing plan.

Git & releases