Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

tech-debt-audit

Thorough, file-cited technical debt audit across 9 dimensions using AST-grep (tree-sitter), grep, LSP, and language-native tooling. Produces TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with severity, effort estimates, and prioritized fixes. Use when asked for codebase health check, tech debt audit, architecture review, code quality assessment, or cleanup planning. Triggers: 'tech debt', 'technical debt', 'debt audit', 'code health', 'technical debt audit', 'codebase health check', 'find tech debt', 'debt analysis', 'audit code quality'.

代码质量与审查70k.agents/skills/tech-debt-audit/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent/tech-debt-audit/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Tech Debt Audit Protocol

Model-agnostic technical debt audit for oh-my-openagent (OMO). Uses OMO's built-in tools (grep, glob, bash with sg, read, lsp_diagnostics, task). Produces a grounded, citable TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md artifact.

Output

Write results to TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md in the repo root with:

  1. Executive Summary — 3-5 sentences: overall health, worst dimension, quick wins count
  2. Mental Model — the repo's architecture in 1 paragraph (what it does, stack, module boundaries)
  3. Findings Table — columns: ID, Category, File:Line, Severity (Critical/High/Medium/Low), Effort (Hours), Description, Recommendation
  4. Top 5 Priorities — ranked by impact/effort ratio
  5. Quick Wins Checklist — items under 30 minutes each
  6. "Looks Bad But Is Fine" — patterns that look like debt but are intentional
  7. Open Questions — things the maintainer should clarify

Phase 0: Orient

Standard (always run)

  1. glob("**/*.ts") / glob("**/*.py") / etc — map the language stack
  2. glob("**/package.json") + read() — dependencies and build tooling
  3. bash("git log --oneline -200") — churn: find highest-change files
  4. glob("**/*") + basic math — find largest files (>300 LOC are candidates)
  5. Cross-reference high-churn + large = debt hot zones
  6. Write the mental model paragraph in your own working context

Phase 1: Audit Across 9 Dimensions

Use OMO tools for each dimension. Run parallel tool calls within each dimension. Every finding MUST cite file:line:col.

1. Architectural Decay

Standard (always run)
  • bash("sg -p \"import { $$$ } from '$SRC'\" -l ts .") — map module graph, look for circular patterns
  • bash("sg -p \"class $NAME { $$$ }\" -l ts .") — check for god classes
  • grep("TODO|FIXME|HACK|XXX|WORKAROUND|TEMP") — tagged debt markers
  • grep("async|await") on sync-looking files — misplaced async boundaries
  • bash("wc -l <file>") on each large file found in Phase 0
What to flag
  • Files > 500 LOC (god files)
  • Functions > 80 LOC or > 4 nesting levels
  • Classes with > 15 methods or > 400 LOC
  • Import cycles (A → B → A)
  • Dead exports: function/class defined but never imported elsewhere (confirm with lsp_find_references)
  • Commented-out code blocks (>3 consecutive consecutive lines)

2. Consistency Rot

Standard (always run)
  • bash("sg -p \"import $CLIENT from '$PKG'\" -l ts .") — multiple HTTP clients
  • grep("console.log|console.error|console.warn") — direct console use vs logger
  • bash("sg -p \"try { $$$ } catch ($$$) { $$$ }\" -l ts .") — error handling patterns
  • grep("as any|@ts-ignore|@ts-expect-error|as unknown") — type escapes
  • grep("eslint-disable|prettier-ignore") — lint suppressions
What to flag
  • 3+ ways of doing the same thing (HTTP, logging, validation, config)
  • Mixed naming conventions (camelCase + snake_case + PascalCase)
  • Multiple date/time handling libraries
  • Mixed error response shapes across modules

3. Type & Contract Debt

Standard (always run)
  • bash("sg -p \"$VALUE as any\" -l ts .") — runtime type escapes
  • grep("@ts-expect-error") — suppressed errors
  • grep("@ts-ignore") — suppressed errors (legacy)
  • bash("sg -p \"$NAME: any\" -l ts .") — typed as any
  • lsp_diagnostics(filePath="<src-dir>") — current type errors
What to flag
  • any types on public APIs and exported interfaces
  • Untyped function parameters
  • Missing schema validation at API/IO boundaries
  • LSP type errors grouped by file

4. Test Debt

Standard (always run)
  • glob("**/*.test.ts") — find all test files
  • bash("bun test 2>&1 | grep -E '(fail|skip|todo)'") — current test health
  • Cross-reference Phase 0 high-churn files with test existence
What to flag
  • Critical-path files with zero tests
  • Skipped tests (test.skip, describe.skip)
  • Tests asserting implementation details vs behavior
  • Slow tests (>1s each)

5. Dependency & Config Debt

Standard (always run)
  • bash("npm audit --omit=dev 2>&1 | head -40") — known CVEs (if node_modules present)
  • read("package.json") — check dependency count and stale deps
  • grep(".env|process.env|Bun.env") — env var usage
  • grep("API_KEY|SECRET|PASSWORD|TOKEN") in non-config files — hardcoded config
What to flag
  • Outdated major-version deps
  • Dependencies that do the same thing (duplicate libraries)
  • Referenced env vars not documented in README
  • Hardcoded environment-specific values

6. Performance & Resource Hygiene

Standard (always run)
  • bash("sg -p \"for ($$$ of $$$) { $$$ await $$$ }\" -l ts .") — async-in-loop
  • grep("await.*map|await.*filter|await.*forEach") — sequential async iteration
  • grep("Promise\\.all|Promise\\.allSettled") — existing parallel patterns (good signal)
  • grep("addEventListener|on\\(|subscribe") without removeEventListener|off\\(|unsubscribe nearby — listener hygiene
What to flag
  • await inside for/of loops (sequential when parallel possible)
  • N+1 query patterns
  • Missing cleanup on event listeners, intervals, handles
  • Unnecessary serialization/deserialization

7. Error Handling & Observability

Standard (always run)
  • bash("sg -p \"catch ($$$) { $$$ }\" -l ts .") — catch blocks
  • grep("catch.*{}|catch.*{\\s*}") — empty catch blocks
  • grep("console.error|logger\\.error|log\\.error") — actual error logging
  • bash("sg -p \"throw new $ERR($$$)\" -l ts .") — error types used
What to flag
  • Empty catch blocks (worst offense)
  • Generic catch (e) { console.error(e) } without recovery
  • Inconsistent error shapes across modules
  • Missing structured logging on critical paths
  • Errors swallowed in promise chains (.catch(() => {}))

8. Security Hygiene

Standard (always run)
  • grep("api[Kk]ey|api_secret|password|secret|token|credential") in source files (not config or env)
  • grep("SELECT .* FROM|INSERT INTO|UPDATE.*SET|DELETE FROM") — SQL construction
  • grep("innerHTML|dangerouslySetInnerHTML") — XSS vectors
  • grep("eval\\(|Function\\(|setTimeout\\(.*string|setInterval\\(.*string") — code injection
What to flag
  • Hardcoded secrets in source
  • String-concatenated SQL
  • innerHTML / dangerouslySetInnerHTML usage
  • eval() or string-based setTimeout/setInterval
  • Permissive CORS or auth middleware

9. Documentation Drift

Standard (always run)
  • read("README.md") — check if claims match reality
  • grep("@param|@returns|@throws") — docstring coverage
  • grep("FIXME|TODO|HACK|XXX|WORKAROUND") — fixme density
  • Compare README API examples with actual signatures
What to flag
  • README claiming features that don't exist
  • Public functions without any doc comment
  • Comments that contradict the code
  • Stale architecture decision records (ADRs) if present

Phase 2: Deeper Dives (Parallel Sub-Agents)

For large codebases (>50k LOC), delegate heavy dimensions to parallel sub-agents. Each sub-agent runs the standard tool passes for its dimensions:

task(category="unspecified-low", run_in_background=true, load_skills=[], prompt="[CONTEXT] Tech debt audit. [GOAL] Audit dimensions 1 (Architecture) and 2 (Consistency). [REQUEST] Run ast_grep and grep searches for dimensions 1-2 from the tech-debt-audit skill. Report every finding with file:line:col. Tag severity: Critical/High/Medium/Low.")
task(category="unspecified-low", run_in_background=true, load_skills=[], prompt="[CONTEXT] Tech debt audit. [GOAL] Audit dimensions 3 (Type debt) and 7 (Error handling). [REQUEST] Run searches for dimensions 3 and 7 from the tech-debt-audit skill. Report every finding with file:line:col. Tag severity.")

Spawn 2-3 sub-agents for the heaviest dimensions, collect results in parallel, then synthesize.

Phase 3: Synthesize & Deliver

  1. Collect all findings from direct tool calls and sub-agent results
  2. Deduplicate — same issue mentioned by multiple dimensions
  3. Classify severity:
    • Critical — Causes incorrect behavior, data loss, or security vulnerability
    • High — Will cause problems in production; blocks maintenance
    • Medium — Reduces maintainability; violates conventions
    • Low — Cosmetic; should fix when in the area
  4. Estimate effort in hours per finding (conservative)
  5. Write TECH_DEBT_AUDIT.md with all required sections
  6. Report summary to the user

Severity Rubric

Critical = actively causing bugs or security holes
High     = will cause problems under normal operation; blocks changes
Medium   = reduces maintainability; inconsistent; violates team conventions
Low      = cosmetic; would be nice to fix when nearby

Quick Checks Before Finishing

  • Every concrete finding has file:line:col citation
  • No generic claims without evidence
  • "Looks Bad But Is Fine" section explains at least 2-3 patterns
  • Top 5 priorities ranked by impact/effort
  • Quick wins are things that can be fixed in <30 minutes each

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review