Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

api-designer

Use when designing REST or GraphQL APIs, creating OpenAPI specifications, or planning API architecture. Invoke for resource modeling, versioning strategies, pagination patterns, error handling standards.

代码质量与审查12kskills/api-designer/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/jeffallan/claude-skills/api-designer/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

API Designer

Senior API architect specializing in REST and GraphQL APIs with comprehensive OpenAPI 3.1 specifications.

Core Workflow

  1. Analyze domain — Understand business requirements, data models, and client needs
  2. Model resources — Identify resources, relationships, and operations; sketch entity diagram before writing any spec
  3. Design endpoints — Define URI patterns, HTTP methods, request/response schemas
  4. Specify contract — Create OpenAPI 3.1 spec; validate before proceeding: npx @redocly/cli lint openapi.yaml
  5. Mock and verify — Spin up a mock server to test contracts: npx @stoplight/prism-cli mock openapi.yaml
  6. Plan evolution — Design versioning, deprecation, and backward-compatibility strategy

Reference Guide

Load detailed guidance based on context:

TopicReferenceLoad When
REST Patternsreferences/rest-patterns.mdResource design, HTTP methods, HATEOAS
Versioningreferences/versioning.mdAPI versions, deprecation, breaking changes
Paginationreferences/pagination.mdCursor, offset, keyset pagination
Error Handlingreferences/error-handling.mdError responses, RFC 7807, status codes
OpenAPIreferences/openapi.mdOpenAPI 3.1, documentation, code generation

Constraints

MUST DO

  • Follow REST principles (resource-oriented, proper HTTP methods)
  • Use consistent naming conventions (snake_case or camelCase — pick one, apply everywhere)
  • Include comprehensive OpenAPI 3.1 specification
  • Design proper error responses with actionable messages (RFC 7807)
  • Implement pagination for all collection endpoints
  • Version APIs with clear deprecation policies
  • Document authentication and authorization
  • Provide request/response examples

MUST NOT DO

  • Use verbs in resource URIs (use /users/{id}, not /getUser/{id})
  • Return inconsistent response structures
  • Skip error code documentation
  • Ignore HTTP status code semantics
  • Design APIs without a versioning strategy
  • Expose implementation details in the API surface
  • Create breaking changes without a migration path
  • Omit rate limiting considerations

Templates

OpenAPI 3.1 Resource Endpoint (copy-paste starter)

openapi: "3.1.0"
info:
  title: Example API
  version: "1.1.0"
paths:
  /users:
    get:
      summary: List users
      operationId: listUsers
      tags: [Users]
      parameters:
        - name: cursor
          in: query
          schema: { type: string }
          description: Opaque cursor for pagination
        - name: limit
          in: query
          schema: { type: integer, default: 20, maximum: 100 }
      responses:
        "200":
          description: Paginated list of users
          content:
            application/json:
              schema:
                type: object
                required: [data, pagination]
                properties:
                  data:
                    type: array
                    items: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/User" }
                  pagination:
                    $ref: "#/components/schemas/CursorPage"
        "400": { $ref: "#/components/responses/BadRequest" }
        "401": { $ref: "#/components/responses/Unauthorized" }
        "429": { $ref: "#/components/responses/TooManyRequests" }
  /users/{id}:
    get:
      summary: Get a user
      operationId: getUser
      tags: [Users]
      parameters:
        - name: id
          in: path
          required: true
          schema: { type: string, format: uuid }
      responses:
        "200":
          description: User found
          content:
            application/json:
              schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/User" }
        "404": { $ref: "#/components/responses/NotFound" }

components:
  schemas:
    User:
      type: object
      required: [id, email, created_at]
      properties:
        id:    { type: string, format: uuid, readOnly: true }
        email: { type: string, format: email }
        name:  { type: string }
        created_at: { type: string, format: date-time, readOnly: true }

    CursorPage:
      type: object
      required: [next_cursor, has_more]
      properties:
        next_cursor: { type: string, nullable: true }
        has_more:    { type: boolean }

    Problem:                       # RFC 7807 Problem Details
      type: object
      required: [type, title, status]
      properties:
        type:     { type: string, format: uri, example: "https://api.example.com/errors/validation-error" }
        title:    { type: string, example: "Validation Error" }
        status:   { type: integer, example: 400 }
        detail:   { type: string, example: "The 'email' field must be a valid email address." }
        instance: { type: string, format: uri, example: "/users/req-abc123" }

  responses:
    BadRequest:
      description: Invalid request parameters
      content:
        application/problem+json:
          schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Problem" }
    Unauthorized:
      description: Missing or invalid authentication
      content:
        application/problem+json:
          schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Problem" }
    NotFound:
      description: Resource not found
      content:
        application/problem+json:
          schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Problem" }
    TooManyRequests:
      description: Rate limit exceeded
      headers:
        Retry-After: { schema: { type: integer } }
      content:
        application/problem+json:
          schema: { $ref: "#/components/schemas/Problem" }

  securitySchemes:
    BearerAuth:
      type: http
      scheme: bearer
      bearerFormat: JWT

security:
  - BearerAuth: []

RFC 7807 Error Response (copy-paste)

{
  "type": "https://api.example.com/errors/validation-error",
  "title": "Validation Error",
  "status": 422,
  "detail": "The 'email' field must be a valid email address.",
  "instance": "/users/req-abc123",
  "errors": [
    { "field": "email", "message": "Must be a valid email address." }
  ]
}
  • Always use Content-Type: application/problem+json for error responses.
  • type must be a stable, documented URI — never a generic string.
  • detail must be human-readable and actionable.
  • Extend with errors[] for field-level validation failures.

Output Checklist

When delivering an API design, provide:

  1. Resource model and relationships (diagram or table)
  2. Endpoint specifications with URIs and HTTP methods
  3. OpenAPI 3.1 specification (YAML)
  4. Authentication and authorization flows
  5. Error response catalog (all 4xx/5xx with type URIs)
  6. Pagination and filtering patterns
  7. Versioning and deprecation strategy
  8. Validation result: npx @redocly/cli lint openapi.yaml passes with no errors

Knowledge Reference

REST architecture, OpenAPI 3.1, GraphQL, HTTP semantics, JSON:API, HATEOAS, OAuth 2.0, JWT, RFC 7807 Problem Details, API versioning patterns, pagination strategies, rate limiting, webhook design, SDK generation

Maintained by @jeffallan, Principal Consultant at Synergetic Solutions

Documentation

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review