跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

using-git-worktrees

Use when a coding task needs a concurrent checkout, unrelated dirty state blocks safe branch switching, or the user or repository explicitly requires a worktree.

代码质量与审查1.3kskills/using-git-worktrees/SKILL.md

安装

把这段话发给 Claude Code、Codex 或 Cursor。智能体会先检查安全性,你确认后才安装。

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/ganyuanran/aegis/using-git-worktrees/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Using Git Worktrees

Overview

A worktree is an exception for simultaneously checking out another Git history, not a general safety badge. Prefer the current workspace and reuse an existing suitable worktree. A branch decision and a worktree decision are separate.

Core principle: create only with necessity and ownership evidence; pair every created worktree with a cleanup path.

Announce at start: explain which concrete checkout conflict requires a worktree.

Step 0: Environment Detection

Before mutation, record the repository root, HEAD, branch/detached state, staged/unstaged/untracked paths, active Git operations, and:

git worktree list --porcelain

Classify the current host surface's task/chat-bound managed workspace semantics as managed, non-managed, or unknown. Use trusted host/session context, an explicit host contract, or a host-native lifecycle result; do not infer the classification from a product name, directory prefix, command-level workdir, missing tool, or absent metadata. non-managed requires positive evidence that the current surface lacks task-bound managed semantics. When the host exposes workspace fields, record the task workspace and the command's default cwd without a per-command directory override.

Stop on unresolved conflicts, an active merge/rebase/cherry-pick/revert/bisect, or an unexplained detached HEAD. A detached HEAD is acceptable only when trusted host binding evidence identifies it as the intended state of the current managed worktree; Codex-managed worktrees, for example, start detached by default. Preserve user state: no automatic stash, reset, clean, broad staging, or commit.

Before deciding necessity or placement, read the smallest relevant project AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, current authority, and existing worktree convention. Repository policy may require or forbid isolation and owns any approved in-repo location; do not discover that policy after creating the checkout.

Step 1: Necessity Decision

Create at most one task-owned worktree only when one of these is true:

  • another branch must remain checked out while this task proceeds;
  • unrelated dirty state prevents a safe checkout in the current workspace;
  • explicit user or current repository authority requires it.

Task complexity, planning, TDD, use of subagents, or a main/master branch name is not sufficient. Same-task subagents share one workspace; do not create per-subagent or nested worktrees. If independent history is unnecessary, do not create a branch either.

Record: reason, branch, exact path, creating coordinator, and expected cleanup event. If the owner or cleanup condition is unknown, stop before creation.

Step 2: Safe Placement

Use an existing repository convention only when the target directory is already ignored (git check-ignore). Never edit or commit .gitignore solely to host a worktree. If no safe in-repo convention exists, use a task-specific external user-level temporary directory outside the repository. Resolve and verify the exact path before creation; do not target a broad home, workspace, or repo root.

Step 3: Create the Minimum Checkout

Prefer reusing an existing branch carrying the same goal. Create a branch only when the approved Git lifecycle requires independent history.

Managed-host binding gate

When the host surface declares task/chat-bound managed workspaces, use its native Worktree/Handoff lifecycle instead of shell creation. Reuse the current task only when trusted host evidence says it is already bound to the intended workspace. If the native operation creates or moves work into another task, continue only in that bound task.

After the native lifecycle operation, or immediately when entering/reusing an already-bound managed workspace, and before the first task content or Git history write, read back one joint postcondition:

  • trusted task workspace;
  • default command cwd without a command-level directory override;
  • intended Git worktree root;
  • intended HEAD and branch/detached state.

All four must describe the same execution environment. git worktree list, a managed-looking path, or a per-command workdir proves only part of that postcondition. If native creation/handoff is unavailable, only UI-driven, or cannot be verified, stop before shell worktree creation or task content/history writes and give the user the host-native re-entry action. Do not silently fall back on git worktree add. Compare resolved path identity using host-appropriate semantics, not raw path strings. The default cwd may equal the worktree root or be inside it; running Git from that default cwd must resolve to the intended worktree root. An intended host-managed detached HEAD satisfies the Git-state component; do not create a branch merely to make that state look like a generic checkout.

If an unbound manual worktree already exists, preserve it and report its exact path, HEAD, branch, status, and ownership evidence. Dirty, untracked, or ownership-unknown state is not auto-migrated, deleted, stashed, reset, or overwritten. A later commit/patch transfer follows normal Git authorization and must be verified in the new bound task before cleanup is offered.

Generic Git fallback

Use the shell path below only when trusted evidence positively classifies the current host/CLI surface as non-managed. An unknown classification fails closed; an absent native tool or missing binding metadata is not generic-fallback evidence.

# Existing branch
git worktree add <exact-path> <branch>

# New independently justified branch
git worktree add -b <branch> <exact-path> <start-point>

Read back git worktree list --porcelain, the new worktree's HEAD/branch, and its status. Do not use force flags. A command-level workdir may target this checkout on a generic host, but it never proves managed task binding.

Step 4: Authority-Led Setup and Baseline

Read the project's install docs, lockfiles, and existing setup scripts. Run only setup the project explicitly requires. Do not infer npm install, cargo build, pip install, poetry install, or dependency downloads merely from manifest presence.

Run the smallest relevant baseline verification. If setup or tests fail, report the exact failure and preserve the worktree; do not hide it by mutating unrelated files.

Step 5: Handoff and Cleanup Ownership

Report the exact path, branch, start HEAD, baseline result, owner, and cleanup trigger. The creating coordinator remains responsible until it proves cleanup or explicitly hands ownership off.

Use finishing-a-development-branch after the task commit or integration decision. A worktree may usually be removed while its unmerged branch remains; an open PR does not require a permanent checkout.

Red Flags

Never:

  • create a worktree only because a task modifies code;
  • modify .gitignore merely to make worktree creation possible;
  • install dependencies blindly;
  • create one worktree per subagent;
  • treat Git readback, a path prefix, or command-level workdir as proof of managed task binding;
  • use shell worktree creation merely because a host-native capability is deferred, UI-only, or absent from the initial tool list;
  • run global prune or force cleanup as routine hygiene;
  • remove dirty, untracked, locked, user-owned, or ownership-unknown resources.

Integration

Called conditionally by planning/execution workflows only after the necessity decision. Pairs with finishing-a-development-branch for evidence-led cleanup.

相似的 Skill

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

代码质量与审查

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

代码质量与审查

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

代码质量与审查

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

代码质量与审查

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

代码质量与审查

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

代码质量与审查