Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

verify

AI DevKit · Enforce evidence-based completion claims — require fresh command output before reporting success. Use when completing any task, fixing a bug, finishing a phase, running tests, building, deploying, or making any "it works" claim.

测试1.6kskills/verify/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/codeaholicguy/ai-devkit/verify/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Verify

Prove it works before saying it works.

Hard Rules

  • Do not claim completion without fresh terminal evidence from this session.
  • Forbidden words in completion claims: "should", "probably", "seems to", "likely", "I believe", "I think it works". These signal unverified assertions.
  • Cached, remembered, or previous-session output is not evidence. Run it again.

Gate Function

Every completion claim must pass all 5 steps in order:

  1. Identify — What command proves this claim? If multiple commands are needed, run the gate once per command.
  2. Run — Execute the full command now. No partial runs, no skipping.
  3. Read — Read complete output. Check exit code. Count pass/fail.
  4. Confirm — Does the output prove the exact claim?
  5. Report — State the result, cite command, exit code, and key output.

If any step fails, stop. Fix the issue and restart from step 1.

If no verification command exists (e.g., no test suite), tell the user and ask them how to verify before claiming done.

Verification Patterns

ClaimRequired EvidenceNot Sufficient
Tests passTest output: 0 failures, exit 0Previous run, "should pass now"
Build succeedsBuild output: exit 0Linter passing, partial build
Bug is fixedReproduce symptom → now passes"Changed code, should be fixed"
Linter cleanLinter output: 0 errorsSingle file check
Phase completeEach criterion verified individually"Tests pass, so done"
Feature worksE2E test or manual walkthroughUnit tests alone

Regression Verification

For bug fixes, a single pass is not enough:

  1. Write a test covering the bug.
  2. Run → must pass (fix in place).
  3. Revert the fix.
  4. Run → must fail (proves test catches the bug).
  5. Restore the fix.
  6. Run → must pass.

If step 4 passes, the test is wrong. Rewrite it.

Red Flags and Rationalizations

RationalizationWhy It's WrongDo Instead
"This change is trivial"Trivial changes break things constantlyRun the check
"I ran it earlier"Code changed since thenRun it again now
"The test is flaky"Flaky ≠ ignorableFix the flake first
"It compiles, so it works"Compilation ≠ correctnessRun the tests
"The CI will catch it"CI is a safety net, not a substituteVerify locally first
"The agent said it's done"Agent claims need verification tooCheck diff and run tests

Memory Integration

After a failed verification, store the failure pattern: npx ai-devkit@latest memory store --title "<failure pattern>" --content "<what failed and how to avoid>" --tags "verify,failure-pattern"

Task Tracing

If a task name is known and tracing is usable, record task evidence after the verification report per task. If tracing was not probed, run the real read probe first. If probe or evidence recording fails, report the failed task command and continue verification; never block verification on optional task logging.

Similar Skills

skill-creator
anthropics/skills180k

skill-creator

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

Testing

ponytail-audit
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-audit

Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find bloat", "what can I delete", /ponytail-audit.

Testing

ponytail-audit
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-audit

Quality audit of the whole repo: bugs, security, real load, missing tests, speed, and what to delete. Most important first.

Testing

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a diff: bugs, security, real load, missing tests, speed, and what to delete. Each finding says what goes wrong and how to fix it.

Testing

ci-cd-and-automation
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

ci-cd-and-automation

Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test runners in CI, or establish deployment strategies.

Testing

idea-refine
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

idea-refine

Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".

Testing