Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

dev-pr

AI DevKit · Publish a ready feature branch for review. Use when the user wants to sync, push, and open or update a code review request on GitHub, GitLab, or another Git host.

代码质量与审查1.6kskills/dev-pr/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/codeaholicguy/ai-devkit/dev-pr/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Dev PR

Publish an already-reviewed branch for code review. Keep this separate from commit creation: if the branch has uncommitted changes, stop and ask the user to run the commit workflow first.

Contract

  1. Verify repository context with git status -sb, git branch --show-current, and git remote -v.
  2. Confirm the branch is not the base branch and has committed changes to publish.
  3. Fetch the remote before comparing or rebasing.
  4. Rebase the feature branch onto the latest remote base branch before push/review.
  5. Resolve conflicts carefully, preserving intended behavior, then rerun relevant validation.
  6. Push safely. Use --force-with-lease only when a rebase rewrote an already-pushed branch.
  7. Open or update the host's review request: PR, merge request, or equivalent.
  8. Report review URL, branch, HEAD SHA, validation results, push mode, and risks.

Publish Workflow

  1. Inspect local context:
    • git status -sb
    • git branch --show-current
    • git remote -v
  2. If uncommitted changes exist, stop. Do not stage, amend, squash, or commit in this skill.
  3. Identify the remote and base branch from repo conventions, upstream config, or user instruction; default to origin/main only when that matches the repo.
  4. Fetch the remote, inspect the delta, and rebase onto the remote base branch.
  5. If conflicts occur, inspect conflicted files and git diff, resolve minimally, validate when useful, git add, then continue the rebase. Stop if the correct resolution is unclear.
  6. Run relevant validation for the changed surface.
  7. Push:
    • First push: set upstream.
    • Normal update: plain push.
    • Rebased already-pushed branch: --force-with-lease.
  8. Open or update the review request using the host's tool/API/UI (gh, glab, forge CLI, web UI, or project-specific workflow).
  9. Write a concise review description. Include enough for reviewers to understand:
    • Summary: what changed, why, and how.
    • Validation: how it was verified.
    • Risks: notable risks or "none known".
  10. Report:
  • Review URL and state
  • Branch and HEAD SHA
  • Validation commands and exit codes
  • Push mode, including whether --force-with-lease was used
  • Risks, follow-ups, or blockers

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review