跳到正文
FunCoding

搜索

搜索文档、Skill 和 MCP

科研 Skill

「科研」分类共 189 个 Skill,按仓库 star 排序。分类自动生成,仅供参考。

visionos
rshankras/claude-code-apple-skills787

visionos

visionOS skills — spatial design (layout ergonomics, eyes-and-hands input, motion comfort, immersion, environments) and widget patterns (mounting styles, glass/paper textures, proximity-aware layouts). Use when designing, building, or reviewing anything for visionOS.

academic-humanizer
dongshuyan/compass-skills753

academic-humanizer

Draft, audit, or minimally revise English- or Chinese-language academic prose to reduce formulaic, vacuous, mechanically repetitive, or process-leaking language while preserving claims, evidence strength, logical relations, manuscript-wide terminology identity, document-level pattern variation, and scholarly register. Use for papers, abstracts, grants, cover letters, and reviewer responses when the user asks to de-AI, humanize, audit AI-like phrasing, or rewrite text without changing meaning. English is primary; Chinese is supported. Not for detector evasion, policy circumvention, pure translation, non-academic copy, or adding facts, citations, examples, or author experiences that the source does not contain.

deep-research
staruhub/ClaudeSkills728

deep-research

Use this skill when the user wants an evidence-based research memo, literature review, market/policy/technical landscape, or a multi-source decision brief with citations, trade-offs, and a clear conclusion. Best for tasks that need synthesis across multiple external sources, iterative follow-up research, or a reusable written artifact. Do not use for quick factual lookups, single-source summaries, simple Q&A, summarizing one document the user already provided, plan-only requests where the user explicitly defers the actual research, or when the user wants a short answer with no need for cited evidence (a short but evidence-backed conclusion is still a brief memo, which this skill covers). Chinese trigger examples: "帮我调研", "深度研究", "综述报告", "技术选型分析", "竞品研究", "政策分析".

agent-research-aggregator
Ar9av/PaperOrchestra679

agent-research-aggregator

Pre-pipeline aggregator that scans AI agent cache directories (.claude, .cursor, .antigravity, .openclaw) or any user-specified directory for experimentation logs, extracts insights and numeric results, and formats them as PaperOrchestra-ready inputs (idea.md + experimental_log.md). TRIGGER when the user says "aggregate my agent logs for paper writing", "extract experiments from my coding agent history", "prepare PaperOrchestra inputs from my cache", "turn my agent logs into a paper", mentions a folder or directory they want to use as the basis for a paper, or wants to run PaperOrchestra but only has scattered agent experiment histories rather than structured inputs. Run this BEFORE paper-orchestra. Also called automatically by paper-orchestra when workspace/inputs/idea.md or workspace/inputs/experimental_log.md are missing.

content-refinement-agent
Ar9av/PaperOrchestra679

content-refinement-agent

Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules, deterministic 0-100 decision bands (Accept/Minor/Major/Reject) that drive a target-met early stop, and a Devil's Advocate concession-threshold guard that blocks acceptance on unresolved critical findings. Maintains a worklog and snapshots each iteration so revert is real, not symbolic. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 5 or when the user asks to "refine the draft", "iterate on the paper", or "run peer review on this paper".

literature-review-agent
Ar9av/PaperOrchestra679

literature-review-agent

Step 3 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Execute the literature search strategy from outline.json — discover candidate papers via web search, verify them through Semantic Scholar (Levenshtein > 70 fuzzy title match, temporal cutoff, dedup by paperId), cross-corroborate against Crossref + OpenAlex to flag hallucinated citations, build a BibTeX file, and draft Introduction + Related Work using ≥90% of the verified pool. Runs in parallel with the plotting-agent. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 3 or when the user asks to "find citations for my paper", "draft the related work", or "build the bibliography".

outline-agent
Ar9av/PaperOrchestra679

outline-agent

Step 1 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Convert (idea.md, experimental_log.md, template.tex, conference_guidelines.md) into a strict JSON outline containing a plotting plan, literature search plan (Intro + Related Work), and section-level writing plan with citation hints. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 1 or when the user asks to "outline a paper from raw materials" or "generate the paper structure".

paper-autoraters
Ar9av/PaperOrchestra679

paper-autoraters

Run the four paper-quality autoraters from PaperOrchestra (arXiv:2604.05018, App. F.3) — Citation F1 (P0/P1 partition + Precision/Recall/F1), Literature Review Quality (6-axis 0-100 with anti-inflation rules), SxS Overall Paper Quality (side-by-side), and SxS Literature Review Quality (side-by-side). TRIGGER when the user asks to "score this paper draft", "evaluate against the benchmark", "compare two papers", or "run the autoraters".

paper-orchestra
Ar9av/PaperOrchestra679

paper-orchestra

Orchestrate the full PaperOrchestra (Song et al., 2026, arXiv:2604.05018) five-agent pipeline to turn unstructured research materials (idea, experimental log, LaTeX template, conference guidelines, optional figures) into a submission-ready LaTeX manuscript and compiled PDF. TRIGGER when the user asks to "write a paper from my experiments", "turn this idea and these results into a paper", "generate a conference submission", "run paper-orchestra on X", or otherwise wants the end-to-end paper-writing pipeline. Coordinates the outline-agent, plotting-agent, literature-review-agent, section-writing-agent, and content-refinement-agent skills.

paper-writing-bench
Ar9av/PaperOrchestra679

paper-writing-bench

Reverse-engineer raw materials (Sparse idea, Dense idea, experimental log) from an existing AI research paper to build a benchmark case for evaluating paper-writing pipelines. Replicates the PaperWritingBench dataset construction procedure from arXiv:2604.05018 §3 / App. C. TRIGGER when the user asks to "build a benchmark case from this paper", "reverse-engineer raw materials", or "evaluate my pipeline against PaperWritingBench".

brand-alchemy
Varnan-Tech/opendirectory674

brand-alchemy

World-class brand strategist and naming expert. Uses an interrogation-led discovery phase to extract your brand's DNA, then applies scientific naming frameworks (Phonosemantics) and automated multi-TLD domain checking.

firecrawl
firecrawl/cli646

firecrawl

Any live-web task via the Firecrawl CLI — including ordinary web research: searching the web, reading or extracting pages, gathering sources, discovering site URLs, bulk extraction, downloading a site, change alerts, or pages needing clicks/login — web only; local files route to firecrawl-parse. For US legal or regulatory questions use gov; for papers use firecrawl-research-index; for library, API, error, or bug questions use firecrawl-developer-index.

firecrawl-research-index
firecrawl/cli646

firecrawl-research-index

Find the papers that answer a research query in Firecrawl's research paper index — a corpus of paper abstracts whose largest share is biomedical and life-science literature (PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv), alongside arXiv preprints in CS, physics, and math — using semantic search, semantic and structural expansion, and in-body verification. Use this skill for literature-finding and paper-retrieval tasks of any kind, including clinical, biomedical, drug, gene, disease, and other life-science questions, whether the answer is a single paper or a full multi-paper set. The index is reached only through the `firecrawl_research_*` MCP tools or the `firecrawl research` CLI subcommands. Calling `firecrawl_search` with its `categories` option set to `["research"]` is a different feature — it filters ordinary web search to research-affiliated websites (the list includes PubMed, bioRxiv, medRxiv, arXiv, and publisher sites) and returns page results from them, without querying the paper records in this index.

light-citation
Light0305/Light-skills640

light-citation

Verify scholarly references and claim-citation support for Light stage 10. Use when auditing a manuscript, claim map, bibliography, DOI/arXiv/PMID/ISBN/URL, BibTeX/CSL, citekeys, chimeric or fabricated citations, retraction/correction alerts, or preparing a canonical citation registry for typesetting. Builds provenance-preserving inventories, confirms metadata with independent authoritative sources, distinguishes CONFIRMED/CONFIRMED-MISSING/UNAVAILABLE/UNRESOLVED, records Crossref update direction, and emits the citation gate plus delivery artifacts.

light-consistency
Light0305/Light-skills640

light-consistency

Light 跨材料一致性常驻机读门:在所有产出材料后台核查术语 / 指标(名+值)/ 创新点表述 / 方法名 在论文·PPT·软著·代码·项目文档之间是否统一,定义一改回扫所有已产出材料,把"各处说法对齐"从口头 建议落成**可机检、可阻断、可被总控 run_checkpoint 聚合的机读门**(产 light.findings.v1,术语/指标/ 创新点硬冲突 → Critical fail → exit 1)。何时用:任一材料产出或修改后、投稿/答辩/提交前的跨材料回扫、 受控定义(术语/指标/创新点)变更后。触发词:一致性 / 术语统一 / 指标对不上 / F1 vs 准确率 / 数值冲突 / 论文和PPT不一致 / 创新点表述 / 方法名 / 改名 / 软著与系统 / 术语表 / 回扫。核心纪律:事实源是项目 `.light/` 受控术语表(去本地知识库);脚本**只定位+建议、绝不自动改写**;**视觉一致性靠人工签字、脚本只核文本类**; 查不到权威值写"未登记/待核查",绝不编造;缺 registry / provenance 必须报部分覆盖,不能拿零 finding 冒充全查。

light-idea-critique
Light0305/Light-skills640

light-idea-critique

Light 科研主线第 4 步·审 idea:以**顶会审稿人标准严审** idea,**撞车/无创新 fatal flaw 一票否决**(critical 门), 逼出真能发表的 idea。何时用:用户问"这 idea 行不行/够不够新/能不能发""帮我严审/挑刺/找致命问题" / idea 定稿前把关 / 收到 idea-generation 的候选要审 / 怀疑撞车(被人做过)。触发词:审 idea / 评审 / 严审 / 挑刺 / 这 idea 行不行 / 够不够新 / 创新性 / 撞车 / 被做过了吗 / 致命问题 / 能投顶会吗 / 拒稿风险 / critique my idea / review this idea / is this novel / fatal flaw / 一票否决。核心纪律:**撞车/无创新的 critical 一票否决在本技能**(不被其他高维度平均救回); **硬性反谄媚**(不被作者反复反驳顺从放行弱 idea);撞车判定**target/background 可追溯分解**非"感觉像";judge 不靠裸 自评(用可计算否决闸门 + 密度先验 + pairwise)。**消费上游 idea-generation 的撞车 findings + facet 槽位**。

light-literature-search
Light0305/Light-skills640

light-literature-search

Light 科研主线第 1 步·文献调研:在线多源检索(OpenAlex/arXiv/Crossref/Europe PMC/DOAJ,全程免 key)→ 产出**不是论文列表,是可直接喂 idea 的"领域地图"**:近三年前沿 + 经典奠基 + 跨领域方法移植**三层分别 检索分别排序**,合成研究脉络 + 方法谱系 + 未解问题地图,揪出**最像你设想的那一篇**→喂 idea-critique 撞车预警,诚实标检索覆盖度。何时用:调研某方向 / 找综述 / 了解某领域有哪些工作 / 提 idea 前摸清前作 / 收集中英文论文·专利·标准·数据集·开源·竞赛方案·行业报告。触发词:文献调研 / 文献综述 / 调研方向 / 领域地图 / 研究现状 / 有哪些工作 / 相关工作 / related work / literature review / survey / 前沿 / 综述 / 找论文 / 撞车 / 新颖性摸底 / 跨领域 / 检索式。核心纪律:不臆造 DOI/被引(查不到写 unknown);三层分别排序 不一锅 relevance;撞车只产**信号**不下 novel 判决(归 idea-critique);覆盖度按真实 HTTP 码诚实标。

light-paper-writing
Light0305/Light-skills640

light-paper-writing

Light 科研主线第 8 步·论文写作:围绕「如何让审稿人相信值得发表」组织,初稿→审稿人视角循环打磨; 每个 claim 都有证据、措辞强度匹配证据强度、绝不过度宣称。何时用:实验+分析做完要写论文 / 写/改摘要·引言· 贡献句·结论 / 担心「claim 无证据 或 措辞夸大」/ 要让贡献三处(摘要·引言·结论)一致 / 引言四段式(痛点→不足→ 洞察→贡献) / 要当审稿人自己挑一遍 / 论文初稿润色去 AI 腔/被动/语法。 触发词:写论文 / 论文写作 / 写摘要 abstract / 写引言 introduction / 贡献句 contribution / 写结论 / 润色 polish / 改写 / 措辞 / 过度宣称 overclaim / claim 无证据 / 审稿人视角 / 自我审稿 / 贡献一致 / hedge / 学术腔 / AI 腔 / 被动语态 / paper writing / draft。 核心纪律:**claim 无证据 = critical 诚信门**(spec §4.2,STAGE_GATES[8]=[claim_evidence,overclaim]); 过度宣称 / 贡献三处不一致 = warn(critical 措辞红线在 research-ethics 交付门);**措辞强度必须匹配证据强度**、 不显著只能报「未见显著差异」、绝不过度宣称;机检措辞有边界,逻辑/创新/论证终判仍需人/审稿人。 本技能是 **8→7(claim 无证据→result-analysis)/ 8→6(实现缺口→experiment-coding)回炉发起方**。

nw-buddy-project-reading
nWave-ai/nWave616

nw-buddy-project-reading

How the nWave buddy agent reads a project to answer questions — detection, order of inspection, and citation discipline.

xiaobei-skill-academic-paper-to-ppt
xiao24bei/xiaobei-skill585

xiaobei-skill-academic-paper-to-ppt

Use for 小北在读研 / XiaoBei academic paper-to-PPT workflows: generate thesis-defense or project-report decks from uploaded papers, literature, reports, technical documents, and optional PPTX visual templates. Produces a source-grounded outline, an imagegen visual scheme, one complete bitmap per slide, an imagegen provenance manifest, and an image-only PPTX. Do not use when the user needs editable slide text or native editable charts.