Identify clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity sources and prioritize subgroup/meta-regression/outlier investigation.
Identify clinical, methodological, and statistical heterogeneity sources and prioritize subgroup, meta-regression, or outlier investigation.
required: [evidence_records, outcome_schema, comparison_context]
optional: [covariate_schema, effect_estimates, subgroup_hypotheses]
constraints: [heterogeneity claims require record-level conditions and provenance]
If unexplained variation may reflect selective reporting rather than substantive moderators, consider assess-publication-bias as the next tactic.
produces: [heterogeneity_sources, moderator_candidates, outlier_list, investigation_priorities]
delta_fields: [findings, evidence_updates, uncertainties, open_questions]
Do not label ordinary measurement noise as a causal subgroup effect, and do not pool records whose condition vectors are incomparable.
resolved: heterogeneity-source-analysisresolved: heterogeneity-investigationAFaffaan-m/ECC279k近 7 天新增 4,056 个 star
GAgarrytan/gstack136k近 7 天新增 872 个 star
ADaddyosmani/agent-skills106k近 7 天新增 3,360 个 star
NEnexu-io/open-design101k近 7 天新增 1,146 个 star
NEnexu-io/open-design101k近 7 天新增 1,146 个 star
THthedotmack/claude-mem100k近 7 天新增 2,735 个 star