Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

01-auto-arena

Automatically evaluate and compare multiple AI models or agents without pre-existing test data. Generates test queries from a task description, collects responses from all target endpoints, auto-generates evaluation rubrics, runs pairwise comparisons via a judge model, and produces win-rate rankings with reports and charts. Supports checkpoint resume, incremental endpoint addition, and judge model hot-swap. Use when the user asks to compare, benchmark, or rank multiple models or agents on a custom task, or run an arena-style evaluation.

测试868skills/arena-eval/01-auto-arena/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/agentscope-ai/openjudge/01-auto-arena/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Auto Arena Skill

End-to-end automated model comparison using the OpenJudge AutoArenaPipeline:

  1. Generate queries — LLM creates diverse test queries from task description
  2. Collect responses — query all target endpoints concurrently
  3. Generate rubrics — LLM produces evaluation criteria from task + sample queries
  4. Pairwise evaluation — judge model compares every model pair (with position-bias swap)
  5. Analyze & rank — compute win rates, win matrix, and rankings
  6. Report & charts — Markdown report + win-rate bar chart + optional matrix heatmap

Prerequisites

# Install OpenJudge
pip install py-openjudge

# Extra dependency for auto_arena (chart generation)
pip install matplotlib

Gather from user before running

InfoRequired?Notes
Task descriptionYesWhat the models/agents should do (set in config YAML)
Target endpointsYesAt least 2 OpenAI-compatible endpoints to compare
Judge endpointYesStrong model for pairwise evaluation (e.g. gpt-4, qwen-max)
API keysYesEnv vars: OPENAI_API_KEY, DASHSCOPE_API_KEY, etc.
Number of queriesNoDefault: 20
Seed queriesNoExample queries to guide generation style
System promptsNoPer-endpoint system prompts
Output directoryNoDefault: ./evaluation_results
Report languageNo"zh" (default) or "en"

Quick start

CLI

# Run evaluation
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --save

# Use pre-generated queries
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml \
  --queries_file queries.json --save

# Start fresh, ignore checkpoint
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --fresh --save

# Re-run only pairwise evaluation with new judge model
# (keeps queries, responses, and rubrics)
python -m cookbooks.auto_arena --config config.yaml --rerun-judge --save

Python API

import asyncio
from cookbooks.auto_arena.auto_arena_pipeline import AutoArenaPipeline

async def main():
    pipeline = AutoArenaPipeline.from_config("config.yaml")
    result = await pipeline.evaluate()

    print(f"Best model: {result.best_pipeline}")
    for rank, (model, win_rate) in enumerate(result.rankings, 1):
        print(f"{rank}. {model}: {win_rate:.1%}")

asyncio.run(main())

Minimal Python API (no config file)

import asyncio
from cookbooks.auto_arena.auto_arena_pipeline import AutoArenaPipeline
from cookbooks.auto_arena.schema import OpenAIEndpoint

async def main():
    pipeline = AutoArenaPipeline(
        task_description="Customer service chatbot for e-commerce",
        target_endpoints={
            "gpt4": OpenAIEndpoint(
                base_url="https://api.openai.com/v1",
                api_key="sk-...",
                model="gpt-4",
            ),
            "qwen": OpenAIEndpoint(
                base_url="https://dashscope.aliyuncs.com/compatible-mode/v1",
                api_key="sk-...",
                model="qwen-max",
            ),
        },
        judge_endpoint=OpenAIEndpoint(
            base_url="https://api.openai.com/v1",
            api_key="sk-...",
            model="gpt-4",
        ),
        num_queries=20,
    )
    result = await pipeline.evaluate()
    print(f"Best: {result.best_pipeline}")

asyncio.run(main())

CLI options

FlagDefaultDescription
--config—Path to YAML configuration file (required)
--output_dirconfig valueOverride output directory
--queries_file—Path to pre-generated queries JSON (skip generation)
--saveFalseSave results to file
--freshFalseStart fresh, ignore checkpoint
--rerun-judgeFalseRe-run pairwise evaluation only (keep queries/responses/rubrics)

Minimal config file

task:
  description: "Academic GPT assistant for research and writing tasks"

target_endpoints:
  model_v1:
    base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
    api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
    model: "gpt-4"
  model_v2:
    base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
    api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
    model: "gpt-3.5-turbo"

judge_endpoint:
  base_url: "https://api.openai.com/v1"
  api_key: "${OPENAI_API_KEY}"
  model: "gpt-4"

Full config reference

task

FieldRequiredDescription
descriptionYesClear description of the task models will be tested on
scenarioNoUsage scenario for additional context

target_endpoints.<name>

FieldDefaultDescription
base_url—API base URL (required)
api_key—API key, supports ${ENV_VAR} (required)
model—Model name (required)
system_prompt—System prompt for this endpoint
extra_params—Extra API params (e.g. temperature, max_tokens)

judge_endpoint

Same fields as target_endpoints.<name>. Use a strong model (e.g. gpt-4, qwen-max) with low temperature (~0.1) for consistent judgments.

query_generation

FieldDefaultDescription
num_queries20Total number of queries to generate
seed_queries—Example queries to guide generation
categories—Query categories with weights for stratified generation
endpointjudge endpointCustom endpoint for query generation
queries_per_call10Queries generated per API call (1–50)
num_parallel_batches3Parallel generation batches
temperature0.9Sampling temperature (0.0–2.0)
top_p0.95Top-p sampling (0.0–1.0)
max_similarity0.85Dedup similarity threshold (0.0–1.0)
enable_evolutionfalseEnable Evol-Instruct complexity evolution
evolution_rounds1Evolution rounds (0–3)
complexity_levels["constraints", "reasoning", "edge_cases"]Evolution strategies

evaluation

FieldDefaultDescription
max_concurrency10Max concurrent API requests
timeout60Request timeout in seconds
retry_times3Retry attempts for failed requests

output

FieldDefaultDescription
output_dir./evaluation_resultsOutput directory
save_queriestrueSave generated queries
save_responsestrueSave model responses
save_detailstrueSave detailed results

report

FieldDefaultDescription
enabledfalseEnable Markdown report generation
language"zh"Report language: "zh" or "en"
include_examples3Examples per section (1–10)
chart.enabledtrueGenerate win-rate chart
chart.orientation"horizontal""horizontal" or "vertical"
chart.show_valuestrueShow values on bars
chart.highlight_besttrueHighlight best model
chart.matrix_enabledfalseGenerate win-rate matrix heatmap
chart.format"png"Chart format: "png", "svg", or "pdf"

Interpreting results

Win rate: percentage of pairwise comparisons a model wins. Each pair is evaluated in both orders (original + swapped) to eliminate position bias.

Rankings example:

  1. gpt4_baseline       [################----] 80.0%
  2. qwen_candidate      [############--------] 60.0%
  3. llama_finetuned      [##########----------] 50.0%

Win matrix: win_matrix[A][B] = how often model A beats model B across all queries.

Checkpoint & resume

The pipeline saves progress after each step. Interrupted runs resume automatically:

  • --fresh — ignore checkpoint, start from scratch
  • --rerun-judge — re-run only the pairwise evaluation step (useful when switching judge models); keeps queries, responses, and rubrics intact
  • Adding new endpoints to config triggers incremental response collection; existing responses are preserved

Output files

evaluation_results/
├── evaluation_results.json     # Rankings, win rates, win matrix
├── evaluation_report.md        # Detailed Markdown report (if enabled)
├── win_rate_chart.png          # Win-rate bar chart (if enabled)
├── win_rate_matrix.png         # Matrix heatmap (if matrix_enabled)
├── queries.json                # Generated test queries
├── responses.json              # All model responses
├── rubrics.json                # Generated evaluation rubrics
├── comparison_details.json     # Pairwise comparison details
└── checkpoint.json             # Pipeline checkpoint

API key by model

Model prefixEnvironment variable
gpt-*, o1-*, o3-*OPENAI_API_KEY
claude-*ANTHROPIC_API_KEY
qwen-*, dashscope/*DASHSCOPE_API_KEY
deepseek-*DEEPSEEK_API_KEY
Custom endpointset api_key + base_url in config

Additional resources

Similar Skills

skill-creator
anthropics/skills180k

skill-creator

Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.

Testing

ponytail-audit
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-audit

Quality audit of a whole repo: bugs, security holes, what breaks under real load, risky code without tests, slow paths, and what to delete, merge or split. Ranked, each finding explained in plain English. One-shot report, changes nothing. Use for "audit this codebase", "review the whole repo", "find bloat", "what can I delete", /ponytail-audit.

Testing

ponytail-audit
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-audit

Quality audit of the whole repo: bugs, security, real load, missing tests, speed, and what to delete. Most important first.

Testing

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a diff: bugs, security, real load, missing tests, speed, and what to delete. Each finding says what goes wrong and how to fix it.

Testing

ci-cd-and-automation
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

ci-cd-and-automation

Automates CI/CD pipeline setup. Use when setting up or modifying build and deployment pipelines. Use when you need to automate quality gates, configure test runners in CI, or establish deployment strategies.

Testing

idea-refine
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

idea-refine

Refines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".

Testing