Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

aider-delegate

Delegate a coding task to Aider (`aider`) as a background implementer, then review its diff and land it yourself. Use this whenever the user wants to hand implementation work to Aider - phrasings like "have Aider do X", "delegate this to aider", "run it through Aider", or "use Aider to implement/fix/refactor" - or wants to run a queue of coding tasks through Aider while staying the reviewer. This includes asking Aider to drive a local or self-hosted OpenAI-compatible endpoint ("have Aider use my local model", "run Aider against llama.cpp / Ollama / vLLM / LM Studio"), which Aider reaches via `--api-base`. DO NOT USE for local-model or coding requests that do not name Aider, for tasks small enough to do inline, or when the user wants the code written directly without delegating.

代码质量与审查2.3kskills/aider-delegate/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/amelnagdy/delegate-skills/aider-delegate/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Aider Delegate

You are the orchestrator. Hand a bounded coding task to a separate implementer - Aider - then review what it produced and land it yourself. You write the brief and own the judgment; Aider does the typing in its own run; you verify and commit.

The loop needs only a shell command and file access, so any comparable orchestrator can drive it.

The one thing to know about Aider

Aider commits by default. Two of its defaults would destroy the reviewable diff this skill exists to produce:

  • --auto-commits (default True) - Aider commits its own edits after each exchange.
  • --dirty-commits (default True) - Aider commits your pre-existing uncommitted work before it starts editing.

The relay always passes --no-auto-commits and --no-dirty-commits, and neither is configurable through it. If you ever drive aider by hand instead of through the relay, pass both yourself, or the work lands as commits you never reviewed. The relay also passes --no-gitignore, because Aider otherwise writes .aider* into .gitignore on startup and dirties the tree you are about to read.

When NOT to use this

  • The task is small enough to do inline; delegation overhead is not worth it.
  • The aider CLI is not installed, or no model is configured for it.
  • You want the implementer to manage its own commits. Aider can, but this skill deliberately turns that off - the diff is the deliverable.

Prerequisites (check once)

  1. Install Aider - python -m pip install aider-chat, or the standalone installer from the Aider install docs.
  2. Configure a model. Aider reads provider keys from the environment (OPENAI_API_KEY, ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, …) or its own config; see Aider's model docs.
  3. Confirm aider --version succeeds.
  4. Work in, or point --cd at, the target git repository.

Choose the model

Aider uses its own configured model when --model is omitted. Pass --model <name> to pick another.

Local and self-hosted models

Aider talks to any OpenAI-compatible endpoint, so this is also the skill for delegating to a model running on the user's own hardware - llama.cpp's server, Ollama, vLLM, LM Studio, or anything else that serves the same API. Pair --model with --api-base:

node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo \
  --model openai/<served-model-name> --api-base http://127.0.0.1:<port>/v1

Three things differ from a hosted provider:

  • The openai/ prefix is required. It tells Aider to speak the OpenAI protocol to your endpoint; the part after it is whatever name your server reports, not a provider catalog name.
  • A placeholder key is still needed. Export any non-empty OPENAI_API_KEY. The client library requires the header even when the server ignores its value.
  • Ask for a smaller edit format. Local models often fail Aider's default diff format, which requires exact search/replace blocks. --edit-format whole trades tokens for reliability; keep the brief's scope tight with --file so whole-file rewrites stay cheap.

A local endpoint that is not running looks like a hang, not an error: Aider retries the connection until the relay's --timeout watchdog fires and reports status: "timeout". Confirm the server is up before dispatching a long brief.

Staying offline

No account or provider registration is involved: Aider is a pip install, the endpoint is yours, and OPENAI_API_KEY only has to be non-empty. The relay pins the flags that would otherwise reach the network on their own - --no-check-update, --no-analytics (Aider's own default is random, which opts some sessions in by itself), and --no-detect-urls, without which Aider offers to scrape any URL in the brief and --yes-always accepts that offer silently.

--no-suggest-shell-commands closes the remaining path by which a run could reach the network without being asked to. What stays outside the relay's control is the brief itself: instructions that tell Aider to install a package or call an API will still be carried out, and --auto-lint runs the repository's own tooling. Offline here means nothing in the dispatch path reaches out on its own - not that a sandbox is stopping it.

The loop

Run these five steps per task. Steps 1, 4, and 5 require judgment; 2 and 3 are mechanical.

1. Write the brief

Aider sees only the text you send plus the files in its editing scope - no chat history or shared context. Include the goal, current state, what to change, what to leave untouched, the project's actual gates, and a report contract. Keep one task per brief. See references/writing-the-brief.md.

2. Dispatch

Use the bundled helper. It wraps Aider's headless --message-file mode, captures the run, and writes result.json. (<skill-dir> is the installed folder containing this SKILL.md.)

node "<skill-dir>/scripts/relay.mjs" --brief brief.txt --cd /path/to/repo
# choose a model:                        add --model <name>
# point at an OpenAI-compatible server:  add --api-base <url>
# scope the edit surface:                add --file <path> (repeatable), --read <path> for context only
# dry run, no files modified:            add --read-only
# continue the previous chat:            add --resume-last  (delta brief only)
# hard time limit (watchdog):            add --timeout 2h  (the 30m default suits short runs; implementation briefs routinely need 1-2h)
# see all options:                       node .../relay.mjs --help

The child process's cwd pins the workspace. The brief is delivered with --message-file, so it never rides argv: it stays out of the host process list and clear of the OS argument size cap. The relay writes artifacts under the system temp dir by default and never commits. See references/dispatch-and-poll.md.

3. Wait for completion

The helper blocks until Aider finishes. Run it with the orchestrator's background-command facility, or background it in the shell and poll for result.json. A pre-run usage error exits 2 and writes no result; a missing aider exits 127 and writes status: "aider_unavailable".

Trust process state and the working tree over a progress display. Completion means the process exited and result.json exists. Aider's report is the finalMessage field in result.json (also printed in full on stdout between the report markers).

Aider exits 0 even when it never reached a model, so the relay scans the run for Aider's own endpoint and authentication errors and reports status: "failed" when it finds one. Treat a failed status with an error mentioning the endpoint as a configuration problem, not a coding failure.

4. Review - do not trust the self-report

Treat Aider's final message and gate claims as claims:

  • Re-run the project's gates yourself.
  • Read the diff against the brief, starting with touchedFiles.
  • Run relevant guard skills if installed.
  • Round-trip migrations and grep for dangling references after removals or renames.

Aider's --auto-lint is on by default, so it may have already run a linter and fixed its own complaints. That is Aider's lint, not your gates - run yours anyway. See references/review-and-land.md.

5. Land it

The implementer edits the working tree; the orchestrator commits. Commit only after the gates pass and the diff holds. If rework is needed, send a delta brief with --resume-last, then review again.

Autonomy and permissions

The relay passes --yes-always, Aider's own term for auto-confirming every prompt, because a headless run cannot answer one. Understand what that consents to in advance. Auto-confirmation applies to every prompt Aider would otherwise raise, and Aider's prompts are not limited to file edits: left at its defaults it also offers to run shell commands it has suggested, and --yes-always would accept those with nobody reading them. The relay therefore pins --no-suggest-shell-commands, which removes that path.

What remains is not a sandbox, and nothing here pretends otherwise. Aider has no permission modes and no isolation: within its file scope it edits freely, and --auto-lint (on by default) runs whatever linter the repository configures. A brief that tells Aider to run a command still gets a command run. Delegation is the authorization; if a run must not be able to touch the host, run it in a container or a throwaway worktree, because no flag in this relay will give you that.

File selection is not a security boundary. --file, --read, and --subtree-only set what Aider puts in its chat context, which is a scoping and token-cost decision. They do not confine what it can reach. See references/writing-the-brief.md.

--read-only maps to Aider's --dry-run, which performs the run without modifying files. The relay does not independently verify that claim - it reports what git status --porcelain shows and warns if a --read-only run left the tree changed. touchedFiles and the diff, not a flag, are the guarantee.

Resume

Aider has no session ids. Its resume unit is the chat history file it keeps in the repository (.aider.chat.history.md), so --resume-last maps to Aider's --restore-chat-history and --history-file pins a specific one. Because that history lives in the repo, resume is per-worktree, not per-user: two clones of the same project do not share it.

Authorization model

Delegation is something the human opts into. Once they have ("run this queue", "proceed"), committing verified, gate-passing work is the agreed contract. Two limits remain: surface, don't absorb (report Aider's design decisions, defensible-but-unasked turns, and non-blocking nitpicks) and stop for scope changes (if correct completion needs going beyond the brief, ask instead of expanding the mandate). See references/review-and-land.md.

References

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review