Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

langsmith-fetch

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces from LangSmith Studio. Use when debugging agent behavior, investigating errors, analyzing tool calls, checking memory operations, or examining agent performance. Automatically fetches recent traces and analyzes execution patterns. Requires langsmith-fetch CLI installed.

代码质量与审查77klangsmith-fetch/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/composiohq/awesome-claude-skills/langsmith-fetch/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

LangSmith Fetch - Agent Debugging Skill

Debug LangChain and LangGraph agents by fetching execution traces directly from LangSmith Studio in your terminal.

When to Use This Skill

Automatically activate when user mentions:

  • 🐛 "Debug my agent" or "What went wrong?"
  • 🔍 "Show me recent traces" or "What happened?"
  • ❌ "Check for errors" or "Why did it fail?"
  • 💾 "Analyze memory operations" or "Check LTM"
  • 📊 "Review agent performance" or "Check token usage"
  • 🔧 "What tools were called?" or "Show execution flow"

Prerequisites

1. Install langsmith-fetch

pip install langsmith-fetch

2. Set Environment Variables

export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_langsmith_api_key"
export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="your_project_name"

Verify setup:

echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY
echo $LANGSMITH_PROJECT

Core Workflows

Workflow 1: Quick Debug Recent Activity

When user asks: "What just happened?" or "Debug my agent"

Execute:

langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5 --format pretty

Analyze and report:

  1. ✅ Number of traces found
  2. ⚠️ Any errors or failures
  3. 🛠️ Tools that were called
  4. ⏱️ Execution times
  5. 💰 Token usage

Example response format:

Found 3 traces in the last 5 minutes:

Trace 1: ✅ Success
- Agent: memento
- Tools: recall_memories, create_entities
- Duration: 2.3s
- Tokens: 1,245

Trace 2: ❌ Error
- Agent: cypher
- Error: "Neo4j connection timeout"
- Duration: 15.1s
- Failed at: search_nodes tool

Trace 3: ✅ Success
- Agent: memento
- Tools: store_memory
- Duration: 1.8s
- Tokens: 892

💡 Issue found: Trace 2 failed due to Neo4j timeout. Recommend checking database connection.

Workflow 2: Deep Dive Specific Trace

When user provides: Trace ID or says "investigate that error"

Execute:

langsmith-fetch trace <trace-id> --format json

Analyze JSON and report:

  1. 🎯 What the agent was trying to do
  2. 🛠️ Which tools were called (in order)
  3. ✅ Tool results (success/failure)
  4. ❌ Error messages (if any)
  5. 💡 Root cause analysis
  6. 🔧 Suggested fix

Example response format:

Deep Dive Analysis - Trace abc123

Goal: User asked "Find all projects in Neo4j"

Execution Flow:
1. ✅ search_nodes(query: "projects")
   → Found 24 nodes

2. ❌ get_node_details(node_id: "proj_123")
   → Error: "Node not found"
   → This is the failure point

3. ⏹️ Execution stopped

Root Cause:
The search_nodes tool returned node IDs that no longer exist in the database,
possibly due to recent deletions.

Suggested Fix:
1. Add error handling in get_node_details tool
2. Filter deleted nodes in search results
3. Update cache invalidation strategy

Token Usage: 1,842 tokens ($0.0276)
Execution Time: 8.7 seconds

Workflow 3: Export Debug Session

When user says: "Save this session" or "Export traces"

Execute:

# Create session folder with timestamp
SESSION_DIR="langsmith-debug/session-$(date +%Y%m%d-%H%M%S)"
mkdir -p "$SESSION_DIR"

# Export traces
langsmith-fetch traces "$SESSION_DIR/traces" --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --include-metadata

# Export threads (conversations)
langsmith-fetch threads "$SESSION_DIR/threads" --limit 20

Report:

✅ Session exported successfully!

Location: langsmith-debug/session-20251224-143022/
- Traces: 42 files
- Threads: 8 files

You can now:
1. Review individual trace files
2. Share folder with team
3. Analyze with external tools
4. Archive for future reference

Session size: 2.3 MB

Workflow 4: Error Detection

When user asks: "Show me errors" or "What's failing?"

Execute:

# Fetch recent traces
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --format json > recent-traces.json

# Search for errors
grep -i "error\|failed\|exception" recent-traces.json

Analyze and report:

  1. 📊 Total errors found
  2. ❌ Error types and frequency
  3. 🕐 When errors occurred
  4. 🎯 Which agents/tools failed
  5. 💡 Common patterns

Example response format:

Error Analysis - Last 30 Minutes

Total Traces: 50
Failed Traces: 7 (14% failure rate)

Error Breakdown:
1. Neo4j Connection Timeout (4 occurrences)
   - Agent: cypher
   - Tool: search_nodes
   - First occurred: 14:32
   - Last occurred: 14:45
   - Pattern: Happens during peak load

2. Memory Store Failed (2 occurrences)
   - Agent: memento
   - Tool: store_memory
   - Error: "Pinecone rate limit exceeded"
   - Occurred: 14:38, 14:41

3. Tool Not Found (1 occurrence)
   - Agent: sqlcrm
   - Attempted tool: "export_report" (doesn't exist)
   - Occurred: 14:35

💡 Recommendations:
1. Add retry logic for Neo4j timeouts
2. Implement rate limiting for Pinecone
3. Fix sqlcrm tool configuration

Common Use Cases

Use Case 1: "Agent Not Responding"

User says: "My agent isn't doing anything"

Steps:

  1. Check if traces exist:

    langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5
    
  2. If NO traces found:

    • Tracing might be disabled
    • Check: LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2=true in environment
    • Check: LANGCHAIN_API_KEY is set
    • Verify agent actually ran
  3. If traces found:

    • Review for errors
    • Check execution time (hanging?)
    • Verify tool calls completed

Use Case 2: "Wrong Tool Called"

User says: "Why did it use the wrong tool?"

Steps:

  1. Get the specific trace
  2. Review available tools at execution time
  3. Check agent's reasoning for tool selection
  4. Examine tool descriptions/instructions
  5. Suggest prompt or tool config improvements

Use Case 3: "Memory Not Working"

User says: "Agent doesn't remember things"

Steps:

  1. Search for memory operations:

    langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 10 --limit 20 --format raw | grep -i "memory\|recall\|store"
    
  2. Check:

    • Were memory tools called?
    • Did recall return results?
    • Were memories actually stored?
    • Are retrieved memories being used?

Use Case 4: "Performance Issues"

User says: "Agent is too slow"

Steps:

  1. Export with metadata:

    langsmith-fetch traces ./perf-analysis --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --include-metadata
    
  2. Analyze:

    • Execution time per trace
    • Tool call latencies
    • Token usage (context size)
    • Number of iterations
    • Slowest operations
  3. Identify bottlenecks and suggest optimizations


Output Format Guide

Pretty Format (Default)

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format pretty

Use for: Quick visual inspection, showing to users

JSON Format

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format json

Use for: Detailed analysis, syntax-highlighted review

Raw Format

langsmith-fetch traces --limit 5 --format raw

Use for: Piping to other commands, automation


Advanced Features

Time-Based Filtering

# After specific timestamp
langsmith-fetch traces --after "2025-12-24T13:00:00Z" --limit 20

# Last N minutes (most common)
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 60 --limit 100

Include Metadata

# Get extra context
langsmith-fetch traces --limit 10 --include-metadata

# Metadata includes: agent type, model, tags, environment

Concurrent Fetching (Faster)

# Speed up large exports
langsmith-fetch traces ./output --limit 100 --concurrent 10

Troubleshooting

"No traces found matching criteria"

Possible causes:

  1. No agent activity in the timeframe
  2. Tracing is disabled
  3. Wrong project name
  4. API key issues

Solutions:

# 1. Try longer timeframe
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 1440 --limit 50

# 2. Check environment
echo $LANGSMITH_API_KEY
echo $LANGSMITH_PROJECT

# 3. Try fetching threads instead
langsmith-fetch threads --limit 10

# 4. Verify tracing is enabled in your code
# Check for: LANGCHAIN_TRACING_V2=true

"Project not found"

Solution:

# View current config
langsmith-fetch config show

# Set correct project
export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="correct-project-name"

# Or configure permanently
langsmith-fetch config set project "your-project-name"

Environment variables not persisting

Solution:

# Add to shell config file (~/.bashrc or ~/.zshrc)
echo 'export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your_key"' >> ~/.bashrc
echo 'export LANGSMITH_PROJECT="your_project"' >> ~/.bashrc

# Reload shell config
source ~/.bashrc

Best Practices

1. Regular Health Checks

# Quick check after making changes
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5

2. Organized Storage

langsmith-debug/
├── sessions/
│   ├── 2025-12-24/
│   └── 2025-12-25/
├── error-cases/
└── performance-tests/

3. Document Findings

When you find bugs:

  1. Export the problematic trace
  2. Save to error-cases/ folder
  3. Note what went wrong in a README
  4. Share trace ID with team

4. Integration with Development

# Before committing code
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 10 --limit 5

# If errors found
langsmith-fetch trace <error-id> --format json > pre-commit-error.json

Quick Reference

# Most common commands

# Quick debug
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 5 --limit 5 --format pretty

# Specific trace
langsmith-fetch trace <trace-id> --format pretty

# Export session
langsmith-fetch traces ./debug-session --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50

# Find errors
langsmith-fetch traces --last-n-minutes 30 --limit 50 --format raw | grep -i error

# With metadata
langsmith-fetch traces --limit 10 --include-metadata

Resources


Notes for Claude

  • Always check if langsmith-fetch is installed before running commands
  • Verify environment variables are set
  • Use --format pretty for human-readable output
  • Use --format json when you need to parse and analyze data
  • When exporting sessions, create organized folder structures
  • Always provide clear analysis and actionable insights
  • If commands fail, help troubleshoot configuration issues

Version: 0.1.0 Author: Ahmad Othman Ammar Adi License: MIT Repository: https://github.com/OthmanAdi/langsmith-fetch-skill

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review