Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

claude-skills

Claude Skills meta-skill: extract domain material (docs/APIs/code/specs) into a reusable Skill (SKILL.md + references/scripts/assets), and refactor existing Skills for clarity, activation reliability, and quality gates.

代码质量与审查3.6kbundled/skills/claude-skills/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/foryourhealth111-pixel/vibe-skills/claude-skills/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Claude Skills Meta-Skill

Turn scattered domain material into a Skill that is reusable, maintainable, and reliably activatable:

  • SKILL.md as the entrypoint (triggers, constraints, patterns, examples)
  • references/ for long-form evidence and navigation
  • optional scripts/ and assets/ for scaffolding and templates

When to Use This Skill

Trigger this meta-skill when you need to:

  • Create a new Skill from scratch from docs/specs/repos
  • Refactor an existing Skill (too long, unclear, inconsistent, misfires)
  • Design reliable activation (frontmatter + triggers + boundaries)
  • Extract a clean Quick Reference from large material
  • Split long content into navigable references/
  • Add a quality gate and a validator

Not For / Boundaries

This meta-skill is NOT:

  • A domain Skill by itself (it builds domain Skills)
  • A license to invent external facts (if the material does not prove it, say so and add a verification path)
  • A substitute for required inputs (if inputs are missing, ask 1-3 questions before proceeding)

Quick Reference

Deliverables (What You Must Produce)

Your output MUST include:

  1. A concrete directory layout (typically skills/<skill-name>/)
  2. An actionable SKILL.md with decidable triggers, boundaries, and reproducible examples
  3. Long-form docs moved to references/ with a references/index.md
  4. A pre-delivery checklist (Quality Gate)
skill-name/
|-- SKILL.md              # Required: entrypoint with YAML frontmatter
|-- references/           # Optional: long-form docs/evidence/index
|   `-- index.md          # Recommended: navigation index
|-- scripts/              # Optional: helpers/automation
`-- assets/               # Optional: templates/configs/static assets

The truly minimal version is just SKILL.md (you can add references/ later).

YAML Frontmatter (Required)

---
name: skill-name
description: "What it does + when to use (activation triggers)."
---

Frontmatter rules:

  • name MUST match ^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$ and SHOULD match the directory name
  • description MUST be decidable (not "helps with X") and include concrete trigger keywords

Minimal SKILL.md Skeleton (Copy/Paste)

---
name: my-skill
description: "[Domain] capability: includes [capability 1], [capability 2]. Use when [decidable triggers]."
---

# my-skill Skill

One sentence that states the boundary and the deliverable.

## When to Use This Skill

Trigger when any of these applies:
- [Trigger 1: concrete task/keyword]
- [Trigger 2]
- [Trigger 3]

## Not For / Boundaries

- What this skill will not do (prevents misfires and over-promising)
- Required inputs; ask 1-3 questions if missing

## Quick Reference

### Common Patterns

**Pattern 1:** one-line explanation
```text
[command/snippet you can paste and run]

Examples

Example 1

  • Input:
  • Steps:
  • Expected output / acceptance:

Example 2

Example 3

References

  • references/index.md: navigation
  • references/...: long-form docs split by topic

Maintenance

  • Sources: docs/repos/specs (do not invent)
  • Last updated: YYYY-MM-DD
  • Known limits: what is explicitly out of scope

### Authoring Rules (Non-negotiable)

1. Quick Reference is for short, directly usable patterns
   - Keep it <= 20 patterns when possible.
   - Anything that needs paragraphs of explanation goes to `references/`.
2. Activation must be decidable
   - Frontmatter `description` should say "what + when" with concrete keywords.
   - "When to Use" must list specific tasks/inputs/goals, not vague help text.
   - "Not For / Boundaries" is mandatory for reliability.
3. No bluffing on external details
   - If the material does not prove it, say so and include a verification path.

### Workflow (Material -> Skill)

Do not skip steps:
1. Scope: write MUST/SHOULD/NEVER (three sentences total is fine)
2. Extract patterns: pick 10-20 high-frequency patterns (commands/snippets/flows)
3. Add examples: >= 3 end-to-end examples (input -> steps -> acceptance)
4. Define boundaries: what is out-of-scope + required inputs
5. Split references: move long text into `references/` + write `references/index.md`
6. Apply the gate: run the checklist and the validator

### Quality Gate (Pre-delivery Checklist)

Minimum checks (see `references/quality-checklist.md` for the full version):
1. `name` matches `^[a-z][a-z0-9-]*$` and matches the directory name
2. `description` states "what + when" with concrete trigger keywords
3. Has "When to Use This Skill" with decidable triggers
4. Has "Not For / Boundaries" to reduce misfires
5. Quick Reference is <= 20 patterns and each is directly usable
6. Has >= 3 reproducible examples
7. Long content is in `references/` and `references/index.md` is navigable
8. Uncertain claims include a verification path (no bluffing)
9. Reads like an operator's manual, not a documentation dump

Validate locally:

```bash
# From repo root (basic validation)
./skills/claude-skills/scripts/validate-skill.sh skills/<skill-name>

# From repo root (strict validation)
./skills/claude-skills/scripts/validate-skill.sh skills/<skill-name> --strict

# From skills/claude-skills/ (basic validation)
./scripts/validate-skill.sh ../<skill-name>

# From skills/claude-skills/ (strict validation)
./scripts/validate-skill.sh ../<skill-name> --strict

Tools & Templates

Generate a new Skill skeleton:

# From repo root (generate into ./skills/)
./skills/claude-skills/scripts/create-skill.sh my-skill --full --output skills

# From skills/claude-skills/ (generate into ../ i.e. ./skills/)
./scripts/create-skill.sh my-skill --full --output ..

# Minimal skeleton
./skills/claude-skills/scripts/create-skill.sh my-skill --minimal --output skills

Templates:

  • assets/template-minimal.md
  • assets/template-complete.md

Examples

Example 1: Create a Skill from Docs

  • Input: an official doc/spec + 2-3 real code samples + common failure modes
  • Steps:
    1. Run create-skill.sh to scaffold skills/<skill-name>/
    2. Write frontmatter description as "what + when"
    3. Extract 10-20 high-frequency patterns into Quick Reference
    4. Add >= 3 end-to-end examples with acceptance criteria
    5. Put long content into references/ and wire references/index.md
    6. Run validate-skill.sh --strict and iterate

Example 2: Refactor a "Doc Dump" Skill

  • Input: an existing SKILL.md with long pasted documentation
  • Steps:
    1. Identify which parts are patterns vs. long-form explanation
    2. Move long-form text into references/ (split by topic)
    3. Rewrite Quick Reference as short copy/paste patterns
    4. Add or fix Examples until they are reproducible
    5. Add "Not For / Boundaries" to reduce misfires

Example 3: Validate and Gate a Skill

  • Input: skills/<skill-name>/
  • Steps:
    1. Run validate-skill.sh (non-strict) to get warnings
    2. Fix frontmatter/name mismatches and missing sections
    3. Run validate-skill.sh --strict to enforce the spec
    4. Run the scoring rubric in references/quality-checklist.md before shipping

References

Local docs:

  • references/index.md
  • references/skill-spec.md
  • references/quality-checklist.md
  • references/anti-patterns.md
  • references/README.md (upstream official reference)

External (official):

Maintenance

  • Sources: local spec files in skills/claude-skills/references/ + upstream official docs in references/README.md
  • Last updated: 2025-12-14
  • Known limits: validate-skill.sh is heuristic; strict mode assumes the recommended section headings

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review