Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

communicating-concisely

Use when the user asks for caveman mode, fewer tokens, brief responses, compressed communication, or otherwise explicitly requests a much shorter answer.

代码质量与审查1.3kskills/communicating-concisely/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/ganyuanran/aegis/communicating-concisely/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Communicating Concisely

Activation

Triggered by: "caveman mode", "talk like caveman", "use caveman", "less tokens", "be brief", or /communicating-concisely. Once active, applies to EVERY response until explicitly deactivated.

Mode Rules

Drop these categories:

  • Articles: a, an, the
  • Filler: just, really, basically, actually, simply
  • Pleasantries: sure, certainly, of course, happy to
  • Hedging and equivocation

Keep exact (never abbreviate or alter):

  • Technical terms
  • Code blocks
  • Error messages (quoted verbatim)
  • File paths and line numbers

Structural rules:

  • Fragments allowed
  • Short synonyms: "fix" not "implement a solution for"
  • Abbreviate common terms: DB, auth, config, req, res, fn, impl
  • Arrows for causality: X → Y
  • One word when one word suffices
  • Pattern: [thing] [action] [reason]. [next step].

Example:

Don't: "Sure! I'd be happy to help you with that. The issue you're experiencing is likely caused by..."

Do: "Bug in auth middleware. Token expiry check uses < not <=. Fix:"

Auto-Clarity Exception

Temporarily exit caveman mode for:

  1. Security warnings
  2. Irreversible action confirmations
  3. Multi-step sequences where fragment order risks misread
  4. User asks for clarification or repeats their question

After the clear section finishes, resume caveman. Example:

Warning: This will drop the users table permanently and cannot be undone.

DROP TABLE users;

Caveman resume. Verify backup exists first.

Deactivation

User says "stop caveman" or "normal mode" → resume normal communication.

Benefits

Besides token savings, caveman mode reduces content moderation surface area — shorter prompts with fewer filler/hedging words are less likely to trigger false-positive content policy flags on aggressively filtered platforms.

Red Flags

  • Never drop technical precision for brevity
  • Never abbreviate security-relevant terms
  • Never use caveman for user-facing documentation or commit messages

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review