writing-skills
OBobra/superpowers298k2,631 new stars in the last 7 days
Reference for writing a Workflow tool script (script API and gotchas, pipeline-vs-barrier rules, quality patterns, worked examples). Load before authoring a script for a workflow the user already opted into; it does not itself authorize running one.
A workflow structures work across many subagents — to be comprehensive (decompose and cover in parallel), to be confident (independent perspectives and adversarial checks before committing), or to take on scale one context can't hold (migrations, audits, broad sweeps). The script is where you encode that structure: what fans out, what verifies, what synthesizes.
When you do call the Workflow tool, the right move is often hybrid: scout
inline first (list the files, scope the diff, find the modules) to discover
the work-list, then call Workflow to pipeline over it, passing the list via
args. You don't need to know the shape before the task — only before the
orchestration step.
Common single-phase workflows you can chain across turns:
For larger work, run several in sequence — read each result before deciding the next phase. You stay in the loop; each workflow is one well-scoped fan-out.
Every script must begin with export const meta = {...}:
export const meta = {
name: 'find-flaky-tests', // kebab-case, required
description: 'Find flaky tests and propose fixes', // required
phases: [ // one entry per phase() call
{ title: 'Scan', detail: 'grep test logs for retries' },
{ title: 'Fix', detail: 'one agent per flaky test' },
],
}
// script body starts here — use agent()/parallel()/pipeline()/phase()/log()
The meta object must be a PURE LITERAL — no variables, function calls,
spreads, or template interpolation.
Every agent() call is one agent-free ephemeral conversation linked to the
invoking parent agent (is_subagent: true, named after the call's label).
It starts with nothing but its prompt: no memory, no conversation context, no
skills. Put ALL context a stage needs in the prompt — file paths, the rule it
should apply, what shape to return.
Subagents are told their final text IS the return value (not a human-facing
message), so they return raw data. Workers inherit the invoking session's tools
and permission mode; use allowedTools to restrict a workflow or stage. For
stages whose input is entirely in the prompt (synthesis, judging, scoring)
pass allowedTools: [] — a model that can still read files tends to wander,
and a subagent that re-issues an identical tool call three times is stopped
and rejects with the failure detail.
Their model defaults to the invoking conversation's model. opts.model (or
the tool's model input) accepts any handle or alias listed by
letta model list; an unknown value rejects that call. Use a
cheaper model for mechanical stages only when you know a valid handle.
Use the invoking backend for workflow workers. Local execution requires an Agent
SDK and App Server with local conversation support; decide() still uses the
Cloud decisions service.
agent(prompt, opts?) → Promise. Spawn one subagent. Resolves to its final
text, or with schema (JSON Schema) to a validated object. Prefer schema
for shaped results: invalid or missing output is retried, then rejects
with validation detail in the error and journal. json: true still parses
without validating; schema wins if both are set. Await each call; failures
reject with the cause, callIndex, and conversationId when available.
Catch errors explicitly to recover. Options: label (display name),
phase (progress group — use this inside concurrent stages), schema,
json, model, effort ('low' for mechanical stages, higher for the
hardest verify/judge stages), allowedTools, systemPrompt (extra system
prompt for this subagent), timeoutMs (default 10 minutes), maxToolCalls
(positive safe integer; default 1000 unique tool calls for this subagent),
conversationId (resume a worker — see "Diagnosing a run").
pipeline(items, stage1, stage2, ...) → run each item through all stages
independently, NO barrier between stages. Item A can be in stage 3 while
item B is still in stage 1. This is the DEFAULT for multi-stage work.
Wall-clock = slowest single-item chain, not sum-of-slowest-per-stage. Every
stage callback receives (prevResult, originalItem, index) — use
originalItem/index in later stages to label work without threading context
through stage 1's return value. A stage that throws skips that item's
remaining stages; siblings finish, then the helper rejects.
parallel(thunks) → run zero-arg functions concurrently. This is a
BARRIER: it awaits all thunks, then rejects if any threw. For best-effort
processing, catch errors inside each thunk and return explicit success/error
results. Use ONLY when you genuinely need all results together.
phase(title) — start a new phase; subsequent agent() calls are grouped
under this title in progress output.
log(message) — emit a progress message to the user.
decide(state, questions, opts?) → Promise; not a subagent call. Ask a
calibrated Jev model (chosen internally — no model option) questions about
state. questions is a non-empty OBJECT keyed by question id — never an
array. Each question needs instructions and a type: choice (criteria
map of id → description, ≤255), score (criteria array of strings, unlike
questions), noul (no criteria). Returns a response whose answers are
keyed by the same ids and calibrated, or null after one retried invalid
answer — guard if (!call); API errors throw.
const call = await decide(evidence, {
behavior: { type: 'choice', instructions: 'Is this behavior a bug?',
criteria: { bad: 'Wrong or harmful', not_bad: 'Expected or harmless' } },
})
const verdict = call?.answers?.behavior?.choice // 'bad' | 'not_bad'
tools.<name>(args?) → Promise; not a subagent call. Calls a built-in
tool registered for the invoking turn (names depend on the toolset, e.g.
tools.Read or tools.exec_command; check listTools()) or one of the
invoking agent's MCP tools (tools.mcp__server__tool) directly. Agent, Workflow,
AskUserQuestion, and SendAgentMessage are not exposed. Each call goes
through the same permission rules as a normal tool call; a tool that would
ask for approval throws instead, so the user must allow it first. A built-in
resolves to its text output. An MCP tool resolves to its
structuredContent, else its text output (parsed when it is JSON), else the
raw content array. Throws when the tool is unavailable, not allowed, or
reports an error; parallel() and pipeline() propagate that rejection.
Use it for deterministic reads and writes whose arguments the script
already knows; use agent() when a step needs judgment.
listTools() → Promise of [{ name, description }] for every callable
tool. describeTool(name) → Promise of { name, description, inputSchema },
or undefined for an unknown name.
const issues = await tools.mcp__linear__list_issues({ team: 'LET', limit: 20 })
args — the value passed as the tool's args input, verbatim. Pass
arrays/objects as actual JSON values, NOT as a JSON-encoded string.
decide() sees only the state you pass; it cannot read files. When compact,
bounded items are already prepared, pass them via args and call decide()
on each directly — don't spawn agent() readers just to relay inputs. Raw
large traces don't belong in args: prepare bounded state that preserves the
user instruction, observed action, and outcome, and mark what was omitted.
Scripts are plain JavaScript, NOT TypeScript — type annotations, interfaces,
and generics fail to parse. The script body runs in an async context — use
await directly and return the final result. Standard JS built-ins (JSON,
Math, Array, etc.) are available; the hooks are the only globals provided.
The script runs inside the CLI process with the CLI's own privileges (the
vm context is a scope, not a security boundary), and the user approves it
by reading it. Keep the script to orchestration: decide what runs and combine
results. Direct tool calls with known arguments belong in tools.*(); work that
needs judgment belongs in subagents, where the tool allowlist applies.
DEFAULT TO pipeline(). Only reach for a barrier (parallel between stages) when stage N needs cross-item context from all of stage N−1:
A barrier is NOT justified by:
pipeline(items, stageA, r => transform([r]).flat(), stageB)agent() and decide() share one pool of concurrent slots per run
(maxConcurrent, default 16) — excess calls queue and run as slots free up,
so passing 100 items is fine. Each has its own 1000-call lifetime backstop.
A single parallel()/pipeline() call accepts at most 4096 items.
When a barrier IS correct — dedup across all findings before expensive verification:
const all = await parallel(DIMENSIONS.map(d => () => agent(d.prompt, {json: true})))
const deduped = dedupeByFileAndLine(all.filter(Boolean).flatMap(r => r.findings ?? [])) // needs ALL at once
const verified = await parallel(deduped.map(f => () => agent(verifyPrompt(f), {json: true})))
Loop-until-count pattern — accumulate to a target:
const bugs = []
let rounds = 0
while (bugs.length < 10 && rounds++ < 5) {
const result = await agent('Find bugs in this codebase. Reply {"bugs": [{file, line, summary}]}', {json: true})
bugs.push(...(result?.bugs ?? []))
log(`${bugs.length}/10 found`)
}
Always bound a loop with a round counter as well as the target: a subagent that keeps returning nothing would otherwise run to the 1000-agent cap.
Composing patterns — exhaustive review (find → dedup vs seen → diverse-lens panel → loop-until-dry):
const seen = new Set(), confirmed = []
let dry = 0
while (dry < 2) { // loop-until-dry
const found = (await parallel(FINDERS.map(f => () => // barrier: collect all finders this round
agent(f.prompt, {phase: 'Find', json: true})))).filter(Boolean).flatMap(r => r.bugs ?? [])
const fresh = found.filter(b => !seen.has(key(b))) // dedup vs ALL seen — plain code, not an agent
if (!fresh.length) { dry++; continue }
dry = 0; fresh.forEach(b => seen.add(key(b)))
const judged = await parallel(fresh.map(b => () => // every fresh bug judged concurrently...
parallel(['correctness','security','repro'].map(lens => () => // ...each by 3 distinct lenses
agent(`Judge "${b.desc}" via the ${lens} lens — real? Reply {"real": boolean}`, {phase: 'Verify', json: true, allowedTools: []})))
.then(vs => ({ b, real: vs.filter(Boolean).filter(v => v.real).length >= 2 }))))
confirmed.push(...judged.filter(v => v.real).map(v => v.b))
}
return confirmed
// dedup vs `seen`, NOT `confirmed` — else judge-rejected findings reappear every round and it never converges.
Adversarial verify: spawn N independent skeptics per finding, each prompted to REFUTE. Kill if ≥majority refute. Prevents plausible-but-wrong findings from surviving.
const votes = await parallel(Array.from({length: 3}, () => () =>
agent(`Try to refute: ${claim}. Default to refuted=true if uncertain. Reply {"refuted": boolean}`, {json: true})))
const survives = votes.filter(Boolean).filter(v => !v.refuted).length >= 2
Perspective-diverse verify: when a finding can fail in more than one way, give each verifier a distinct lens (correctness, security, perf, does-it-reproduce) instead of N identical refuters — diversity catches failure modes redundancy can't.
Judge panel: generate N independent attempts from different angles (e.g. MVP-first, risk-first, user-first), score with parallel judges, synthesize from the winner while grafting the best ideas from runners-up. Beats one-attempt-iterated when the solution space is wide.
Loop-until-dry: for unknown-size discovery (bugs, issues, edge cases), keep spawning finders until K consecutive rounds return nothing new. Simple counters (while count < N) miss the tail.
Multi-modal sweep: parallel agents each searching a different way (by-container, by-content, by-entity, by-time). Each is blind to what the others surface; useful when one search angle won't find everything.
Completeness critic: a final agent that asks "what's missing — modality not run, claim unverified, source unread?" What it finds becomes the next round of work.
No silent caps: if a workflow bounds coverage (top-N, no-retry,
sampling), log() what was dropped — silent truncation reads as "covered
everything" when it didn't.
Scale to what the user asked for. "find any bugs" → a few finders, single-vote verify. "thoroughly audit this" or "be comprehensive" → larger finder pool, 3–5 vote adversarial pass, synthesis stage. When unsure, lean toward thoroughness for research/review/audit requests and toward brevity for quick checks.
Every run persists its script, args, and a journal.jsonl with one line per
completed subagent call (prompt, outcome, conversation id) under
~/.letta/workflows/executions/<id>/; the tool result names the paths. Before
diagnosing why a workflow returned an empty or unexpected result, read that
journal — it records each agent's actual return value and failure detail.
A failed run is not resumable: fix the script and launch it again.
The script is never replayed, but one worker can continue:
agent(prompt, {conversationId}) re-prompts it with history and model intact,
using a journal ID and only once its last Run is terminal. Local workers can
only continue inside the same workflow execution that observed their completed
turn. Tools inherit the invoking session unless allowedTools is supplied;
schema and effort are chosen per turn. Needs
SDK 0.8.20+.
OBobra/superpowers298k2,631 new stars in the last 7 days
OBobra/superpowers298k2,631 new stars in the last 7 days
MAmattpocock/skills288k10,178 new stars in the last 7 days
MAmattpocock/skills288k10,178 new stars in the last 7 days
MAmattpocock/skills288k10,178 new stars in the last 7 days
MAmattpocock/skills288k10,178 new stars in the last 7 days