Create comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step actions, and expected outcomes. Use when writing QA test cases, creating test plans, defining acceptance tests, or preparing for feature validation.
Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent reviews the Skill for safety first and installs it after you confirm.
读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/phuryn/pm-skills/test-scenarios/install.md ，按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。
Create comprehensive test scenarios from user stories with test objectives, starting conditions, user roles, step-by-step test actions, and expected outcomes.
Use when: Writing QA test cases, creating test plans, defining acceptance test scenarios, or validating user story implementations.
Arguments:
$PRODUCT: The product or system name$USER_STORY: The user story to test (title and acceptance criteria)$CONTEXT: Additional testing context or constraintsTest Scenario: [Clear scenario name]
Test Objective: [What this test validates]
Starting Conditions:
User Role: [Who performs the test]
Test Steps:
Expected Outcomes:
Test Scenario: View Recently Viewed Products on Product Page
Test Objective: Verify that the 'Recently viewed' section displays correctly and excludes the current product.
Starting Conditions:
User Role: Online Shopper
Test Steps:
Expected Outcomes:
anthropics/skills180kCreate new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
Testing
addyosmani/agent-skills102kDrives development with tests using the red-green-refactor loop. Use when implementing any logic, fixing any bug, or changing any behavior. Use when you need to prove that code works, when a bug report arrives, or when you're about to modify existing functionality.
Testing
addyosmani/agent-skills102kExtracts what the user actually wants instead of what they think they should want. Achieves this through one-question-at-a-time interview until ~95% confidence about the underlying intent. Use when an ask is underspecified ("build me X" without "for whom" or "why now"), when the user explicitly invokes ("interview me", "grill me", "are we sure?", "stress-test my thinking"), or when you catch yourself silently filling in ambiguous requirements before any plan, spec, or code exists.
Testing
addyosmani/agent-skills102kRefines raw ideas into sharp, actionable concepts through structured divergent and convergent thinking. Use when an idea is still vague, when you need to stress-test assumptions before committing to a plan, or when you want to expand options before converging on one. Triggers on "ideate", "refine this idea", or "stress-test my plan".
Testing
addyosmani/agent-skills102kSubjects every non-trivial decision to a fresh-context adversarial review before it stands. Use when you want every assumption cross-examined before proceeding, when stress-testing a plan for hidden failure modes, when correctness matters more than speed, when working in unfamiliar code, when stakes are high (production auth, security-sensitive logic, a high-stakes migration, irreversible operations), or any time a confident output would be cheaper to verify now than to debug later.
Testing
addyosmani/agent-skills102kGuides systematic root-cause debugging. Use when tests fail, builds break, something that worked yesterday broke, behavior doesn't match expectations, or you encounter any unexpected error. Use when you need to figure out what broke and why — a systematic approach to finding and fixing the root cause rather than guessing.
Testing