Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, Skills and MCP

gemini

Use when the user asks to run Gemini CLI for code review, plan review, or big context (>200k) processing. Ideal for comprehensive analysis requiring large context windows. Uses Gemini 3 Pro by default for state-of-the-art reasoning and coding.

代码质量与审查2.5kskills/gemini/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent checks the Skill for safety first and installs it only after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/softaworks/agent-toolkit/gemini/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

Gemini Skill Guide

When to Use Gemini

  • WHEN ASKED TO BE ACTIVATED
  • Code Review: Comprehensive code reviews across multiple files
  • Plan Review: Analyzing architectural plans, technical specifications, or project roadmaps
  • Big Context Processing: Tasks requiring >200k tokens of context (entire codebases, documentation sets)
  • Multi-file Analysis: Understanding relationships and patterns across many files

⚠️ Critical: Background/Non-Interactive Mode Warning

NEVER use --approval-mode default in background or non-interactive shells (like Claude Code tool calls). It will hang indefinitely waiting for approval prompts that cannot be provided.

For automated/background reviews:

  • ✅ Use --approval-mode yolo for fully automated execution
  • ✅ OR wrap with timeout: timeout 300 gemini ...
  • ❌ NEVER use --approval-mode default without interactive terminal

Symptoms of hung Gemini:

  • Process running 20+ minutes with 0% CPU usage
  • No network activity
  • Process state shows 'S' (sleeping)

Fix hung process:

# Check if hung
ps aux | grep gemini | grep -v grep

# Kill if necessary
pkill -9 -f "gemini.*gemini-3-pro-preview"

Running a Task

  1. Ask the user (via AskUserQuestion) which model to use in a single prompt. Available models:

    • gemini-3-pro-preview ⭐ (flagship model, best for coding & complex reasoning, 35% better at software engineering than 2.5 Pro)
    • gemini-3-flash (sub-second latency, distilled from 3 Pro, best for speed-critical tasks)
    • gemini-2.5-pro (legacy option, strong all-around performance)
    • gemini-2.5-flash (legacy option, cost-efficient with thinking capabilities)
    • gemini-2.5-flash-lite (legacy option, fastest processing)
  2. Select the approval mode based on the task:

    • default: Prompt for approval (⚠️ ONLY for interactive terminal sessions)
    • auto_edit: Auto-approve edit tools only (for code reviews with suggestions)
    • yolo: Auto-approve all tools (✅ REQUIRED for background/automated tasks)
  3. Assemble the command with appropriate options:

    • -m, --model <MODEL> - Model selection
    • --approval-mode <default|auto_edit|yolo> - Control tool approval
    • -y, --yolo - Alternative to --approval-mode yolo
    • -i, --prompt-interactive "prompt" - Execute prompt and continue interactively
    • --include-directories <DIR> - Additional directories to include in workspace
    • -s, --sandbox - Run in sandbox mode for isolation
  4. For background/automated tasks, ALWAYS use --approval-mode yolo or add timeout wrapper. NEVER use default in non-interactive shells.

  5. Run the command and capture the output. For background/automated mode:

    # Recommended: Use yolo for background tasks
    gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo "Review this codebase for security issues"
    
    # Or with timeout (5 min limit)
    timeout 300 gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo "Review this codebase"
    
  6. For interactive sessions with an initial prompt:

    gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview -i "Review the authentication system" --approval-mode auto_edit
    
  7. After Gemini completes, inform the user: "The Gemini analysis is complete. You can start a new Gemini session for follow-up analysis or continue exploring the findings."

Quick Reference

Use caseApproval modeKey flags
Background code reviewyolo ✅-m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo
Background analysisyolo ✅-m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo
Background with timeoutyolo ✅timeout 300 gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo
Interactive code reviewdefault-m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode default (interactive terminal only)
Code review with auto-editsauto_edit-m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode auto_edit
Automated refactoringyolo-m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo
Speed-critical backgroundyolo ✅-m gemini-3-flash --approval-mode yolo
Cost-optimized backgroundyolo ✅-m gemini-2.5-flash --approval-mode yolo
Multi-directory analysisyolo (if background)--include-directories <DIR1> --include-directories <DIR2>
Interactive with promptauto_edit or default-i "prompt" --approval-mode <mode>

Model Selection Guide

ModelBest forContext windowKey features
gemini-3-pro-preview ⭐Flagship model: Complex reasoning, coding, agentic tasks1M input / 64k outputVibe coding, 76.2% SWE-bench, $2-4/M input
gemini-3-flashSub-second latency, speed-critical applications1M input / 64k outputDistilled from 3 Pro, TPU-optimized
gemini-2.5-proLegacy: Strong all-around performance1M input / 65k outputThinking mode, mature stability
gemini-2.5-flashLegacy: Cost-efficient, high-volume tasks1M input / 65k outputBest price ($0.15/M), thinking mode
gemini-2.5-flash-liteLegacy: Fastest processing, high throughput1M input / 65k outputMaximum speed, minimal latency

Gemini 3 Advantages: 35% higher accuracy in software engineering, state-of-the-art on SWE-bench (76.2%), GPQA Diamond (91.9%), and WebDev Arena (1487 Elo). Knowledge cutoff: January 2025.

Coming Soon: gemini-3-deep-think for ultra-complex reasoning with enhanced thinking capabilities.

Common Use Cases

Code Review (Background/Automated)

# For background execution (Claude Code, CI/CD, etc.)
gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo \
  "Perform a comprehensive code review focusing on:
   1. Security vulnerabilities
   2. Performance issues
   3. Code quality and maintainability
   4. Best practices violations"

# With timeout safety (5 minutes)
timeout 300 gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo \
  "Perform a comprehensive code review..."

Plan Review (Background/Automated)

# For background execution
gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo \
  "Review this architectural plan for:
   1. Scalability concerns
   2. Missing components
   3. Integration challenges
   4. Alternative approaches"

Big Context Analysis (Background/Automated)

# For background execution
gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode yolo \
  "Analyze the entire codebase to understand:
   1. Overall architecture
   2. Key patterns and conventions
   3. Potential technical debt
   4. Refactoring opportunities"

Interactive Code Review (Terminal Only)

# ONLY use default mode in interactive terminal
gemini -m gemini-3-pro-preview --approval-mode default \
  "Review the authentication flow for security issues"

Following Up

  • Gemini CLI sessions are typically one-shot or interactive. Unlike Codex, there's no built-in resume functionality.
  • For follow-up analysis, start a new Gemini session with context from previous findings.
  • When proposing follow-up actions, restate the chosen model and approval mode.
  • Use AskUserQuestion after each Gemini command to confirm next steps or gather clarifications.

Error Handling

  • Stop and report failures whenever gemini --version or a Gemini command exits non-zero.
  • Request direction before retrying failed commands.
  • Before using high-impact flags (--approval-mode yolo, -y, --sandbox), ask the user for permission using AskUserQuestion unless already granted.
  • When output includes warnings or partial results, summarize them and ask how to adjust using AskUserQuestion.

Troubleshooting Hung Gemini Processes

Detection

# Check for hung processes
ps aux | grep -E "gemini.*gemini-3" | grep -v grep

# Look for these symptoms:
# - Process running 20+ minutes
# - CPU usage at 0%
# - Process state 'S' (sleeping)
# - No network connections

Diagnosis

# Get detailed process info
ps -o pid,etime,pcpu,stat,command -p <PID>

# Check network activity
lsof -p <PID> 2>/dev/null | grep -E "(TCP|ESTABLISHED)" | wc -l
# If result is 0, process is hung

Resolution

# Kill hung Gemini processes
pkill -9 -f "gemini.*gemini-3-pro-preview"

# Or kill specific PID
kill -9 <PID>

# Verify cleanup
ps aux | grep gemini | grep -v grep

Prevention

  • ALWAYS use --approval-mode yolo for background/automated tasks
  • Add timeout wrapper for safety: timeout 300 gemini ...
  • Never use --approval-mode default in non-interactive shells
  • Monitor first run with ps to ensure process completes

Tips for Large Context Processing

  1. Be specific: Provide clear, structured prompts for what to analyze
  2. Use include-directories: Explicitly specify all relevant directories
  3. Choose the right model:
    • Use gemini-3-pro-preview for complex reasoning, coding tasks, and maximum analysis quality (recommended default)
    • Use gemini-3-flash for speed-critical tasks requiring sub-second response times
    • Use gemini-2.5-flash for cost-optimized high-volume processing
  4. Leverage Gemini 3's strengths: 35% better at software engineering tasks, exceptional at agentic workflows and vibe coding
  5. Break down complex tasks: Even with large context, structured analysis is more effective
  6. Save findings: Ask Gemini to output structured reports that can be saved for reference

CLI Version

Requires Gemini CLI v0.16.0 or later for Gemini 3 model support. Check version: gemini --version

Similar Skills

claude-api
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail158k

ponytail-review

Quality review of a change: is the logic right, is it safe, does it hold under real load, is risky code tested, is it fast enough, and is every line needed. Reads the connected code, not only the diff. Each finding is explained in plain English. Use for "review this", "code review", "review the last commit", "review my PR", "is this over-engineered", /ponytail-review.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills103k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

understand
Egonex-AI/Understand-Anything86k

understand

Analyze a codebase to produce an interactive knowledge graph for understanding architecture, components, and relationships

Code quality & review