Skip to content
FunCoding

Search

Search docs, agents, posts, Skills and MCP servers

cqrs-implementation

Implement Command Query Responsibility Segregation for scalable architectures. Use when separating read and write models, optimizing query performance, or building event-sourced systems.

代码质量与审查40kplugins/backend-development/skills/cqrs-implementation/SKILL.md

Install

Send this to Claude Code, Codex or Cursor. The agent reviews the Skill for safety first and installs it after you confirm.

读取 https://funcoding.ai/skills/wshobson/agents/cqrs-implementation/install.md ,按里面的步骤帮我安装这个 Skill。

SKILL.md

CQRS Implementation

Comprehensive guide to implementing CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) patterns.

When to Use This Skill

  • Separating read and write concerns
  • Scaling reads independently from writes
  • Building event-sourced systems
  • Optimizing complex query scenarios
  • Different read/write data models needed
  • High-performance reporting requirements

Core Concepts

1. CQRS Architecture

                    ┌─────────────┐
                    │   Client    │
                    └──────┬──────┘
                           │
              ┌────────────┴────────────┐
              │                         │
              ▼                         ▼
       ┌─────────────┐          ┌─────────────┐
       │  Commands   │          │   Queries   │
       │    API      │          │    API      │
       └──────┬──────┘          └──────┬──────┘
              │                         │
              ▼                         ▼
       ┌─────────────┐          ┌─────────────┐
       │  Command    │          │   Query     │
       │  Handlers   │          │  Handlers   │
       └──────┬──────┘          └──────┬──────┘
              │                         │
              ▼                         ▼
       ┌─────────────┐          ┌─────────────┐
       │   Write     │─────────►│    Read     │
       │   Model     │  Events  │   Model     │
       └─────────────┘          └─────────────┘

2. Key Components

ComponentResponsibility
CommandIntent to change state
Command HandlerValidates and executes commands
EventRecord of state change
QueryRequest for data
Query HandlerRetrieves data from read model
ProjectorUpdates read model from events

Templates and detailed worked examples

Full template library and detailed worked examples live in references/details.md. Read that file when you need the concrete templates.

Best Practices

Do's

  • Separate command and query models - Different needs
  • Use eventual consistency - Accept propagation delay
  • Validate in command handlers - Before state change
  • Denormalize read models - Optimize for queries
  • Version your events - For schema evolution

Don'ts

  • Don't query in commands - Use only for writes
  • Don't couple read/write schemas - Independent evolution
  • Don't over-engineer - Start simple
  • Don't ignore consistency SLAs - Define acceptable lag

Similar Skills

claude-api
Official
anthropics/skills180k

claude-api

Reference for the Claude API / Anthropic SDK — model ids, pricing, params, streaming, tool use, MCP, agents, caching, token counting, model migration. TRIGGER — read BEFORE opening the target file; don't skip because it "looks like a one-liner" — whenever: the prompt names Claude/Anthropic in any form (Claude, Anthropic, Fable, Opus, Sonnet, Haiku, `anthropic`, `@anthropic-ai`, `claude-*`, `us.anthropic.*`, `[1m]`); the user asks about an LLM (pricing/model choice/limits/caching) — never answer from memory; OR the task is LLM-shaped with provider unstated (agent/MCP/tool-definition/multi-agent/RAG/LLM-judge/computer-use; generate/summarize/extract/classify/rewrite/converse over NL; debugging refusals/cutoffs/streaming/tool-calls/tokens). SKIP only when another provider is being worked on (overrides all triggers): OpenAI/GPT/Gemini/Llama/Mistral/Cohere/Ollama named in the query; OR `grep -rE 'openai|langchain_openai|google.generativeai|genai|mistralai|cohere|ollama'` over the project hits (run this grep FIRST if no provider named — don't Read the file).

Code quality & review

ponytail
DietrichGebert/ponytail157k

ponytail

Lazy senior dev mode for any coding task (write, refactor, fix, review): YAGNI, stdlib first, no unrequested abstractions. Not for non-coding requests.

Code quality & review

ponytail-review
DietrichGebert/ponytail157k

ponytail-review

Code review focused exclusively on over-engineering. Finds what to delete: reinvented standard library, unneeded dependencies, speculative abstractions, dead flexibility. One line per finding: location, what to cut, what replaces it. Use when the user says "review for over-engineering", "what can we delete", "is this over-engineered", "simplify review", or invokes /ponytail-review. Complements correctness-focused review, this one only hunts complexity.

Code quality & review

documentation-and-adrs
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

documentation-and-adrs

Records decisions and documentation. Use when you need to document an architecture decision (ADR) or the reasoning behind a design choice, when changing public APIs, shipping features, or when you need to record context that future engineers and agents will need to understand the codebase.

Code quality & review

code-simplification
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

code-simplification

Simplifies code for clarity. Use when refactoring code for clarity without changing behavior. Use when code works but is harder to read, maintain, or extend than it should be. Use when reviewing code that has accumulated unnecessary complexity.

Code quality & review

code-review-and-quality
addyosmani/agent-skills102k

code-review-and-quality

Conducts multi-axis code review. Use before merging any change. Use when reviewing code written by yourself, another agent, or a human. Use when you need to assess code quality across multiple dimensions before it enters the main branch. Use when asked to review a diff or a pull request, even when the diff is pasted inline.

Code quality & review