Skip to content
FunCoding

analyze-future-scenarios

Construct and compare plausible future/competitive/temporal/stress scenarios and test whether the research path remains robust across them.

Star
503
License
Apache-2.0
Last commit
Sep 29, 2026

skills/analyze-future-scenarios/SKILL.md

View on GitHub

analyze-future-scenarios

Purpose

Construct and compare plausible future/competitive/temporal/stress scenarios and test whether the research path remains robust across them.

Input contract

required: [research_path, scenario_axes, uncertainty_drivers]
optional: [assumptions, prior_findings, evidence_updates]
constraints: [consume named scientific objects; preserve provenance; keep unresolved uncertainty visible]

Execution protocol

Do not perform called SOP operations inline; each loaded SOP owns its contract and thresholds.

  1. You MUST load skill identify-scenario-drivers to rank the horizon's high-impact uncertainties.
  2. You MUST load skill enumerate-dimension-values to enumerate representative, boundary, and adversarial driver values.
  3. You MUST load skill evaluate-compatibility to prune incompatible combinations while retaining near-boundary cases.
  4. You MUST load skill construct-scenario to assemble distinct baseline, counterfactual, and extreme-but-plausible worlds.
  5. You MUST load skill evaluate-scenario-impact to score the research path inside each fixed world and record failure triggers.
  6. You MUST load skill evaluate-scenario-robustness to aggregate per-world results and expose fragile assumptions.
  7. You MUST load skill predict-competitive-move to forecast credible competitor moves and preemption risk.
  8. You MUST load skill analyze-temporal-trajectory to order outcomes through time and reveal regime changes.

Deviation: reorder only when a dependency is already satisfied or unavailable; record the reason and confidence effect.

Output contract

produces: [scenario_set, impact_comparison, robustness_assessment]
delta_fields: [findings, decisions]

Thresholds and quality gates

  • Each output is traceable to an input object, operation, and evidence reference.
  • Scope, assumptions, and unresolved alternatives remain explicit.
  • Retain $\alpha$ 0.05 and power 0.8 wherever the predeclared statistical design requires them.

Failure and counterexamples

Stop synthesis when a required object is absent, a precondition is violated, or a counterexample invalidates the proposed conclusion; return the partial delta with the failure recorded.

Provenance map

  • intermediate: experiment-execution/scenario-planning [campaign]
  • resolved: morphological-scenario
  • resolved: narrative-scenario
  • resolved: stress-scenario
  • resolved: competitive-scenario
  • resolved: temporal-scenario
  • resolved: parameter-space-construction
  • resolved: cross-consistency-filtering
  • resolved: strategy-robustness-testing

Preserved source criteria ledger

sourcecriteriontreatment
resolved v3 entries abovenode-specific criteriaretained and specialized to the v4 object contract
experiment-execution/statistical-testing$\alpha$ = 0.05fixed value retained where applicable
experiment-execution/sample-size-estimationpower = 0.8fixed value retained where applicable

Context checkpoint / Delta notes

Return the node-specific research-state delta and preserve findings, evidence updates, uncertainties, decisions, open questions, and recommended jumps as applicable.

Similar Skills

test-driven-development

OBobra/superpowers299k2,675 new stars in the last 7 days

migrate-to-shoehorn

MAmattpocock/skills290k10,235 new stars in the last 7 days

agent-runtime-gateway-smoke-test

AFaffaan-m/ECC279k4,056 new stars in the last 7 days

Featured

accessibility

Audit accessibility on Web, iOS, and Android to meet WCAG 2.2, with keyboard navigation and screen-reader support.

AFaffaan-m/ECC279k4,056 new stars in the last 7 days

ai-regression-testing

AFaffaan-m/ECC279k4,056 new stars in the last 7 days

Official

firecrawl-build-interact

FIfirecrawl/firecrawl191k2,014 new stars in the last 7 days