Skip to content
FunCoding

figure-table-planner

Plan the smallest set of diagnostic, comparison, paper, and appendix figures or tables needed to support verified mathematical-modeling decisions and claims.

Star
1,057
Category
Science
License
MIT
Last commit
Sep 24, 2026

plugins/mathmodeling-skills/skills/figure-table-planner/SKILL.md

View on GitHub

Purpose

Make every visual evidence-bearing. Prefer fewer useful visuals over a decorative inventory.

Inputs

  • method card and decision ledger;
  • run summaries and final result analysis;
  • robustness evidence;
  • solution package and frozen numbers in submission mode;
  • existing figures/tables.

Figure Types

  • Type 1 diagnostic: internal debugging; never in the paper.
  • Type 2 comparison: main vs usable baseline or a genuinely tested alternative; optional in paper.
  • Type 3 paper: directly supports a main claim; required only when the claim benefits materially from a visual.
  • Type 4 appendix: supplementary evidence referenced from the main text.

Workflow

  1. List verified claims that need visual or exact tabular support.
  2. Reuse an existing artifact when it already communicates the claim.
  3. For each proposed visual record:
    • ID and Qx;
    • type;
    • source artifact and frozen claim IDs when applicable;
    • one core claim;
    • chart/table form;
    • target section;
    • status and render needs.
  4. Ask the human to confirm judgment-bearing Type 3 claims through one compact choice card when they are not already in the decision ledger.
  5. Save methods/Qx/qx_figure_table_plan.md only when durable planning is needed. In lean exploration, a compact in-conversation plan is sufficient.

Planning Heuristics

  • Use tables for exact values, parameters, and small comparisons.
  • Use plots for trends, distributions, sensitivity, or many-item comparisons.
  • Use diagrams for mechanisms, dependencies, and workflows.
  • A main-vs-baseline figure needs compatible metrics and the same evaluation setup.
  • Do not create a multi-method comparison merely to imply breadth.

Rules

  • Type 1 never enters the paper.
  • Type 3 uses final validated sources and a human-confirmed core claim.
  • Do not use unresolved exploratory figures as paper evidence.
  • Do not fabricate data, captions, or claims.
  • Do not fill plans with placeholder sentinels; pause for one human choice instead.
  • Every visual must have a source and purpose.

Verification

  • Each planned visual supports a verified claim.
  • Types, sources, sections, and statuses are explicit.
  • Type 3 claims trace to human decisions and frozen evidence.
  • No unnecessary or decorative visual remains.

Similar Skills

wiki-query

PApaperclipai/paperclip101k2,948 new stars in the last 7 days

Official

clinical-case-report

NEnexu-io/open-design101k1,126 new stars in the last 7 days

systematic-literature-review

BYbytedance/deer-flow84k368 new stars in the last 7 days

academic-paper-review

BYbytedance/deer-flow84k368 new stars in the last 7 days

directory-submissions

COcoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k958 new stars in the last 7 days

academic-paper

IMImbad0202/academic-research-skills52k972 new stars in the last 7 days