Skip to content
FunCoding

paper-section-writer

Draft submission-ready mathematical-modeling paper sections from the approved solution package, frozen numbers, human decision ledger, and verified figures without searching scattered exploratory outputs or inventing interpretation.

Star
1,057
Category
Science
License
MIT
Last commit
Sep 24, 2026

plugins/mathmodeling-skills/skills/paper-section-writer/SKILL.md

View on GitHub

Preconditions

  • rigor_profile is submission.
  • Final method explanation exists.
  • Final result analysis exists.
  • Solution package and current frozen numbers exist.
  • Required human claim-scope and physical/domain-meaning decisions are recorded.

If any prerequisite is missing, return to its producer rather than drafting around the gap.

Primary Sources

Use, in order:

  1. qx_solution_package_for_writer.md
  2. frozen_numbers.json
  3. qx_decisions.jsonl
  4. verified paper figures/tables
  5. final method explanation and robustness report for clarification

Do not hunt through raw experiment folders to invent a narrative.

Workflow

  1. Resolve the requested section and contest format.
  2. Build a claim map:
    • claim ID;
    • frozen value/source;
    • robustness support;
    • human decision ID;
    • figure/table reference;
    • limitation.
  3. Draft the method description to match the final explanation and code.
  4. Draft results with:
    • value and comparison;
    • human-confirmed physical/domain meaning;
    • uncertainty or robustness;
    • limitation and applicable scope.
  5. Mention the baseline and eliminated alternatives only when they explain a real decision.
  6. Use only Type 2–4 figures as appropriate; never place Type 1 diagnostics in the paper.
  7. Save paper/sections/qx.tex or the requested Markdown section.

Human-Owned Content

The AI must not originate:

  • why the method was chosen;
  • what the headline number means physically;
  • confidence and claim scope;
  • contribution framing.

Transcribe these from the decision ledger with provenance. If absent, invoke a compact choice card and stop the final draft until answered; do not fill the paper with repeated sentinels.

Rules

  • Every numerical claim must match frozen_numbers.json.
  • Do not overclaim against untested methods or populations.
  • Do not fabricate citations or causal meaning.
  • Avoid procedural diary prose and ceremonial detail.
  • Keep formulas, symbols, units, captions, and filenames consistent.
  • Do not create a new decision artifact.

Verification

  • Three writer prerequisites pass.
  • Claim map resolves all numbers and judgments.
  • Method, results, and figures match canonical artifacts.
  • Physical meaning and contribution are human-owned.
  • Limitations and uncertainty are visible.
  • No Type 1 figure appears.

Similar Skills

wiki-query

PApaperclipai/paperclip101k2,948 new stars in the last 7 days

Official

clinical-case-report

NEnexu-io/open-design101k1,126 new stars in the last 7 days

systematic-literature-review

BYbytedance/deer-flow84k368 new stars in the last 7 days

academic-paper-review

BYbytedance/deer-flow84k368 new stars in the last 7 days

directory-submissions

COcoreyhaines31/marketingskills54k958 new stars in the last 7 days

academic-paper

IMImbad0202/academic-research-skills52k972 new stars in the last 7 days